Categories: AU

Landmark Ruling Overturns Controversial Anti-Protest Laws, Protecting Free Speech and Synagogue Security

Share and Follow

A court has nullified extensive police powers that allowed authorities to relocate protesters from areas surrounding places of worship, following critiques that these measures were overreaching and hindered personal freedoms.

The anti-protest laws were swiftly implemented in February after a spate of anti-Semitic acts across Sydney and Melbourne, including graffiti, arson attacks and threats of personal violence.

Critics argued that these powers, which permitted police to disperse protesters considered too close to religious sites, were unconstitutional and excessively broad.

When implementing the laws in February, Premier Chris Minns was warned the laws would be problematic (Sitthixay Ditthavong)

According to pro-Palestine activist Josh Lees, the lack of clarity regarding the scope of this legislation or the definition of “nearness” rendered it ineffective and posed a potential threat to the right to protest in New South Wales. He presented his case before the state’s Supreme Court.

Justice Anna Mitchelmore ruled in favor of Lees, determining that the laws unjustly restricted individuals’ freedom of communication and were therefore invalid.

She dismissed the argument put forth by NSW Solicitor-General Michael Sexton SC, who contended that the laws were specifically designed to protect individuals from harassment by disruptive protesters as they entered or exited places of worship.

The police powers had an “obvious and legitimate purpose” after being introduced in response to threats and attacks at places of worship around the country, he argued.

Lee’s legal team contended the laws were discriminatory because they expressly target certain types of political speech in a way that inevitably favoured some viewpoints over others.

The NSW Supreme Court tossed out the anti-protest laws introduced in February. (Nine)

That was upheld by the judge, who swept aside Sexton’s contention that the validity of the laws wasn’t affected by the fact there were exemptions for union rallies or for people in charge of places of worship to permit protests.

When implementing the laws in February, Premier Chris Minns was warned the laws would be problematic when many town squares had a church, including outside the Supreme Court itself.

But Labor instead listened to concerns from peak Jewish groups after rallies went past the Great Synagogue in Sydney’s centre.

NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley at the time said the boosted police powers would ensure people could practice their beliefs in safety.

Share and Follow
NewsFinale Journal

Share
Published by
NewsFinale Journal

Recent Posts

Watch ‘Tracker’ Season 3, Episode 2 Live Tonight on CBS: Air Time and Streaming Details

The much-anticipated return of Tracker has finally arrived. The popular CBS survival drama launched its…

5 seconds ago

Trump Issues Fresh Advisory on Tylenol Use During Pregnancy

On Sunday, former President Donald Trump reiterated his cautionary advice to pregnant women regarding the…

7 minutes ago

Urgent Recall: Metal Contamination Threat Prompts Recall of 2 Million Pounds of Pork Jerky from Costco and Sam’s Club

In a significant recall, a company based in South Dakota is pulling over 2.2 million…

9 minutes ago

Teen Girls Reveal Unexpected Details in Mother’s Tragic Brawl Incident

In a dramatic turn of events, four teenage girls have confessed to killing a mother…

15 minutes ago

Breaking News: New York AG Letitia James Faces Federal Fraud Charges – Pleads Not Guilty

New York Attorney General Letitia James fervently denied fraud allegations on Friday, asserting her innocence…

18 minutes ago

Japan Urges Stronger Australia Partnership Amidst Quad Alliance Tensions Post-Trump Era

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has told Prime Minister Anthony Albanese their two countries should…

34 minutes ago