Share and Follow
Senior European and Ukrainian diplomats gathered in Geneva on Sunday for discussions ahead of their meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubi regarding a proposed resolution to the ongoing conflict that has persisted for four years.
This proposal, which emerged from dialogues between Washington and Moscow, meets several of Russia’s conditions that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has consistently dismissed, including the cession of significant territories.
Early on Sunday morning (Monday AEDT), Trump, who inherited the conflict from the prior U.S. administration, shared his thoughts on the situation.
He declared, “A war that is a loser for everyone, especially the millions of people that have so needlessly died,” emphasizing his point with capital letters.
Trump also criticized, “Ukraine’s ‘leadership’ has shown no gratitude for our efforts, and Europe persists in purchasing oil from Russia.”
The Ukrainian leader has vowed that his people”will always defend” their home.
The head of the Ukrainian delegation, presidential chief of staff Andrii Yermak, wrote on social media on Sunday that they held their first meeting with the national security advisers from the UK, France and Germany.
The allies have rallied around Kyiv in a push to revise the plan, which is seen as favouring Moscow.
“The next meeting is with the US delegation. We are in a very constructive mood,” Yermak said.
“We continue working together to achieve a lasting and just peace for Ukraine.”
Rubio was expected to join the talks together with Army Secretary Dan Driscoll and Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff.
Zelenskyy said he was waiting for the outcome of the talks.
“A positive result is needed for all of us,” he said.
“Ukrainian and American teams, teams of our European partners — are in close contact, and I very much hope there will be a result,” he wrote in a post on Telegram on Sunday.
Bloodshed must be stopped and it must be guaranteed that the war will not be reignited
In a later post, Zelenskyy said that there was an understanding the US would take into account “a number of elements” in a peace deal that are important for Ukraine, but did not elaborate further.
“There have already been brief reports from the team about the results of the first meetings and conversations,” he said. “There is now an understanding that the American proposals may take into account a number of elements based on the Ukrainian vision and are critically important for Ukraine’s national interests.”
“Further work is ongoing to ensure that all elements are truly effective in achieving the main goal our people hope for — ultimately putting an end to the bloodshed and the war.”
Ukraine and allies have ruled out territorial concessions
The 28-point blueprint drawn up by the US to end the war has sparked alarm in Kyiv and European capitals. Zelenskyy has said his country could face a stark choice between standing up for its sovereign rights and preserving the American support it needs.
Speaking before Sunday’s talks, Alice Rufo, France’s minister delegate at the Defence Ministry, told broadcaster France Info that key points of discussion would include the plan’s restrictions on the Ukrainian army, which she described as “a limitation on its sovereignty.”
“Ukraine must be able to defend itself,” she said.
“Russia wants war and waged war many times in fact over the past years.”
Speaking to reporters outside the White House on Saturday, Trump said the US proposal was not his “final offer”.
“I would like to get to peace. It should have happened a long time ago. The Ukraine war with Russia should have never happened,” Trump said.
“One way or the other, we have to get it ended.”
Trump didn’t explain what he meant by the plan not being his final offer and the White House didn’t respond to a request for clarification.
Rubio’s reported comments cause confusion
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Sunday that Warsaw was ready to work on the plan with the leaders of Europe, Canada and Japan, but also said that it “would be good to know for sure who is the author of the plan and where was it created.”
Some US politicians said Saturday that Rubio had described the plan as a Russian “wish list” rather than a Washington-led proposal.
The bipartisan group of senators told a news conference that they had spoken to Rubio about the peace plan after he reached out to some of them while on his way to Geneva. Independent Maine Sen. Angus King said Rubio told them the plan “was not the administration’s plan” but a “wish list of the Russians.”
A State Department spokesperson denied their account, calling it “blatantly false”.
Rubio himself then took the extraordinary step of suggesting online that the senators were mistaken, even though they said he was their source for the information. The secretary of state doubled down on the assertion that Washington was responsible for a proposal that had surprised many from the beginning for being so favourable to Moscow.