Hamas’ response stopped well short of fully endorsing each of Trump’s twenty points, including critical ones like demanding Hamas disarm and destroy their weapons, and that it play no role in governing Gaza in the future.

Yet Trump chose to focus on what Hamas did agree to rather than what it didn’t.

For him, the group’s declaration it was ready to release all the remaining hostages held since the October 7, 2023, terror attacks was enough. And after months of frustratingly slow progress, Trump appeared ready to proceed as if peace was finally at hand – even if the finer details remained uncertain.

His reaction, posted only an hour or so after Hamas released its six-paragraph reply, had the effect of preempting any response from Israel itself, including from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who Trump and his team had pushed to accept the peace plan earlier in the week.

“Based on the Statement just issued by Hamas, I believe they are ready for a lasting PEACE,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

“Israel must immediately stop the bombing of Gaza, so that we can get the Hostages out safely and quickly!”

In a statement from his office early Saturday, Netanyahu said that “Israel is preparing to immediately implement the first phase of Trump’s plan for the immediate release of all hostages.”

“We will continue to work in full cooperation with the president and his team to end the war in accordance with the principles set forth by Israel that are consistent with President Trump’s vision,” Netanyahu’s office said.

“Everybody was unified in wanting this war to end and seeing peace in the Middle East, and we’re very close to achieving that,” he said.

It wasn’t clear how coordinated Trump’s response was with the Israelis; the White House did not announce a phone call between the men.

And while Trump, in his video statement, personally thanked Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan for their efforts to broker peace, he made no mention of Netanyahu.

Even without a call, Trump’s message was clear. After publicly heaping pressure on Hamas to accept the plan, including by issuing a Sunday night ultimatum to agree or else face “all hell” in Gaza, Trump was essentially shifting the onus back to Israel to end its bombardment. It was the first time Trump has explicitly told Israel to halt its relentless assault on Gaza.

An Israeli source told CNN that Trump’s celebration of Hamas’ response to the proposal surprised Netanyahu twice – including when Trump ordered that Israel immediately stop bombing Gaza, the source said, which forced Israel to halt its assault on Gaza City.

Israel was preparing to hold any renewed negotiations only under fire, as the Israeli military continued bombarding the battered territory. But Trump left Israel with little choice.

Neither the prime minister’s office nor the Israel Defence Forces addressed Trump’s demand that Israel “immediately stop the bombing of Gaza,” or gave any indication of a timeline for the hostages’ release. Israel is now preparing a negotiating team for talks to finalise the ceasefire proposal, according to an Israeli official.

Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, will travel to Egypt this weekend for negotiations on details of the hostage release agreed to by Hamas and other aspects of peace plan, according to two US officials.

Trump on Saturday afternoon (Sunday morning AEDT) announced that following negotiations, Israel has agreed to an “initial withdrawal line” that he said has also been shared with Hamas.

“When Hamas confirms, the Ceasefire will be IMMEDIATELY effective, the Hostages and Prisoner Exchange will begin, and we will create the conditions for the next phase of withdrawal, which will bring us close to the end of this 3,000 YEAR CATASTROPHE,” the president said on Truth Social.

Hamas’s response drew a far more lukewarm response from even some of Trump’s staunchest allies.

“Hamas’ recent response to President Trump’s plan to end the war – which Israel had accepted – is unfortunately predictable. A classic ‘Yes, but,'” Senator Lindsey Graham wrote on X.

“No disarmament, keeping Gaza under Palestinian control, and tying hostage release to negotiations, along with other problems. This is, in essence, a rejection by Hamas of President Trump’s ‘take it or leave it’ proposal.”

Trump, however, was more willing to accept the statement as a positive development, even as he acknowledged there was still work to be done on finalising the details of the arrangement.

“We’ll see how it all turns out. We have to get the final word down in concrete,” he said in his video, taped from the Oval Office.

Trump had been waiting anxiously for Hamas to respond to his proposal over the last several days. In a call with Qatar’s emir on Wednesday, Trump inquired about progress, but was told it may take longer for the group to respond.

Communication problems with Hamas’ military leaders in Gaza contributed to the time it took to receive a response, as did divisions among Hamas leadership over elements of the plan, according to US officials, who were advised of the difficulties by regional partners this week.

Still, Trump was growing impatient, and issued the Sunday night ultimatum on Friday morning hoping it would spur Hamas into responding.

Ultimately, the response that arrived could have provided Trump an opening to declare Hamas intransigent, and green-light Israel escalating its assault – as he said he would do if Hamas rejected the plan. But Trump, in looking past the areas where Hamas appeared to differ with the plan, put Netanyahu in the difficult position of either accepting the response positively, or risking angering his top international ally.

Trump has been increasingly at odds with Netanyahu since reentering office in January, frequently engaging in tense phone calls with his counterpart over the unending nature of the war in Gaza and Israel’s expansion of the conflict beyond its borders – all moves that could imperil Trump’s chances of winning a Nobel Peace Prize.

So, too, have members of Trump’s base become more and more disillusioned with Israel’s war in Gaza as it nears its two-year mark, with some – including Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene – labelling Israel’s actions a “genocide.”

Most galling for Trump was the Israeli strikes in Qatar last month aimed at Hamas leaders, which Trump and US officials viewed as destabilising and harmful to ongoing efforts to negotiate a peace. Trump complained publicly the US wasn’t given time to intervene.–

The strikes, which drew universal condemnation from Arab countries, eventually prompted Trump’s team to begin work on the multipoint plan that became the proposal unveiled earlier this week, officials said.

In meetings in New York last week, top Trump aides – Witkoff and Kushner, reprising the Middle East adviser role he held in Trump’s first term – worked to get Netanyahu’s buy-in to the proposal, even as the prime minister appeared reluctant to sign on.

Trump’s aides, and Trump himself, were explicit in their conversations with Netanyahu that the plan was the best – and last – chance for a negotiated end to the war. They warned Trump’s mostly stalwart public support for Netanyahu and Israel could be at risk, according to US officials.

It was only after hours of discussion, and changing to some of the plan’s wording, that Netanyahu eventually agreed to get on board, according to US officials. Some of the changes alarmed Arab nations that had been briefed on the plan the week prior. But as Trump and Netanyahu were meeting in the Oval Office on Monday, the White House published the text – cementing the changes and putting Hamas on notice to agree.

As part of their meeting, Trump held a telephone on his lap while Netanyahu telephoned Qatar’s prime minister to apologise for strikes on Hamas leaders in Doha last month. The move was viewed as essential in advancing the negotiations, given the important role Qatar has played in mediating with Hamas.