Share and Follow
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a significant move, the U.S. Education Department is transferring some of its largest grant programs to other federal entities as part of the Trump administration’s swift efforts to phase out the department.
This marks a pivotal advancement in the administration’s ongoing strategy to dismantle the department, largely characterized by workforce reductions since President Donald Trump issued an executive order in March calling for its closure.
Under six newly inked agreements, substantial grant programs amounting to billions of dollars will be reassigned to different agencies. Among these, a key transition involves the Department of Labor assuming control over major federal funding sources for K-12 education, particularly Title I funds designated for schools in low-income areas.
Officials have confirmed that congressional funding levels for these programs will be maintained. However, they have not commented on whether these shifts will lead to further staffing reductions, following significant layoffs and voluntary retirements that have already thinned the department’s workforce.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon stated, “The Trump Administration is decisively dismantling the federal education bureaucracy to empower state-level education. Streamlining bureaucratic processes in Washington is a crucial element of our ultimate mission.”
The action leaves in place the Education Department’s $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio and its funding for students with disabilities, though McMahon has suggested both would be better managed by other federal departments.
McMahon and her staff have spent months hammering out the deals, which allow the department to lop off large parts of its footprint without action from Congress. It’s being done through formal agreements that agencies often make with one another when their work overlaps.
The Education Department tested the idea in June with a deal that moved adult education programs to Labor. The new agreements take it a step further and lay the groundwork for more.
Officials say the new agreements provide a “proof of concept” as the administration works to persuade Congress to close the agency. The goal is to convince Congress that the deals should be cemented into legislation, eliminating a need for the department.
Under the new plan, Labor will oversee almost all grant programs that are now managed by the Education Department’s offices for K-12 and higher education. Along with the $18 billion Title I program, that includes smaller funding pools for teacher training, English instruction and TRIO, a program that helps steer low-income students to college degrees.
It will effectively outsource the department’s Office of Elementary and Secondary Education and Office of Postsecondary Education, two of the agency’s largest units. Two major roles of the postsecondary office will remain with the Education Department: oversight of student loan policy and the accreditation of colleges for eligibility to receive students’ federal financial aid.
States and schools should not expect any disruptions in their funding, the department said, but their federal money will now come from the Department of Labor.
Another deal will put Health and Human Services in charge of a grant program for parents who are attending college, along with management of foreign medical school accreditation. The State Department will take on foreign language programs. Interior will oversee programs for Native American education.
Opponents have urged against such a shake-up, saying it could disrupt programs that support some of the nation’s most vulnerable student populations. Some argue that other agencies don’t have the expertise that schools and families rely on at the Education Department. Some also question the plan’s legality, noting that legislation requires the Education Department to oversee some of its operations in-house.
Department officials say their plan is legally sound and argue it will make programs more efficient.
McMahon has increasingly pointed to what she sees as failures of the department as she argues for its demise. In its 45 years, she says it has become a bloated bureaucracy while student outcomes continue to lag behind. She points to math and reading scores for the country’s K-12 students, which plummeted in the wake of pandemic restrictions.
Her vision would abolish the Education Department and give states wider flexibility in how they spend money that’s now earmarked for specific purposes, including literacy and education for homeless students. That, however, would require approval from Congress. The task is complicated by the fact that some of the department’s core work has long had bipartisan support.
The new deals are part of a broader plan to prove that America’s schools and colleges can operate without the department. As part of the plan, officials say McMahon will continue touring the country to highlight the successes of local schools — and she will also spend more time making her pitch to lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
___