Delphi suspect Richard Allen attorneys quit before hearing
Share and Follow

Andrew Baldwin, Brad Rozzi, and Richard Allen (YouTube:WTHR screenshot, Westville Correctional Facility)

Andrew Baldwin, Brad Rozzi, and Richard Allen (YouTube: WTHR screenshot, Westville Correctional Facility)

One week after the presiding judge in the high-profile Delphi murders case announced that both attorneys representing accused killer Richard Allen had withdrawn in an “unexpected turn of events” during the case’s first broadcasted hearing, Allen’s sole remaining attorney says the judge “ambushed” him and his co-counsel before the proceedings and essentially ordered them to quit.

He’s now seeking to remain as Allen’s attorney and to have the judge thrown off the case.

During last week’s hearing, Special Judge Fran C. Gull said that one of Allen’s attorneys, Andrew Baldwin, had orally withdrawn from the case. That withdrawal came after sealed evidence was leaked from Baldwin’s office and provided to a true crime podcast. Gull said that Allen’s other attorney, Brad Rozzi, also planned to submit a written notification of his withdrawal.

The online court docket for the case has the following order from Gull for the Oct. 19 hearing:

“Prior to the scheduled hearing this date, Attorneys Rozzi and Baldwin advise the Court they will be withdrawing their representation of the defendant. Court accepts their representations and orders them withdrawn from the cause. Counsel ordered to comply with the previously entered Protective Order on Discovery and are ordered to turn the discovery over in full to the State of Indiana to be made available to successor counsel.”

But Rozzi never submitted his written resignation, and in a series of motions filed Thursday, he requested that Gull be disqualified from presiding over the trial. The motions claim that Gull violated the state’s judicial code of conduct when she allegedly “removed and concealed, or allowed to be removed by the Clerk of Carroll County, defense pleadings from the chronological case summary in violation of the Indiana Supreme Court’s Administrative Rules.”

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Watchdog reports that the Trump administration is breaking FOIA laws regarding immigration documents

President Donald Trump speaks during an “Invest in America” roundtable with business…

Judge provides Newsom with additional options to contest Trump’s power

President Donald Trump speaks after signing a bill blocking California”s rule banning…

Girl who drove woman over with woman’s car gets sentenced

Background: News footage of the scene in Wauwatosa, Wis., after Sunita Balogun…

Kentucky Mom Beats 6-Year-Old Daughter With Hammer, Yells to Son, ‘Let Me Finish Her!’

A 6-year-old Kentucky girl is in critical condition and her mother in…

Travis Decker: Fugitive Father Who Suffocated 3 Daughters Is Still Alive, Police Say

Police believe a Washington father accused of killing his three daughters is…

Law&Crime’s Prime Crime achieves top 4 position on Spotify’s ranking

Share copy link Prime Crime with Jesse Weber (Law&Crime) Law&Crime”s original docuseries…

Individual boasted about making money from sex trafficking on social media

Inset: Cedric Dorsey II (Bellevue Police Department). Background: Dorsey poses with a…

Diddy’s Alleged Drug Mule Takes Stand, Says Key Accuser ‘Absolutely’ Wasn’t Forced Into ‘Freak Offs’

One of Sean “Diddy” Combs’ former assistants testified on Friday about getting…