Trump DOJ probing Tina Peters case for 'abuses' of justice
Share and Follow

Left: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the East Room at the White House Thursday, Feb. 27, 2025, in Washington (Carl Court/Pool Photo via AP). Right: Former Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters looks on during sentencing for her election interference case at the Mesa County District Court Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024, in Grand Junction, Colo. (Larry Robinson/The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel via AP).

President Donald Trump’s Justice Department is probing the state conviction of Tina Peters — the first election official found guilty of a felony over 2020 election conspiracy theories — to see if there were “abuses of the criminal justice process” and a legal bias “toward inflicting political pain,” the DOJ says.

Peters, 69, was convicted last August on seven counts of engaging in a security breach related to unauthorized access to voting machines while she worked as a county clerk in Mesa County, Colorado. In October — after a marathon hearing in which Peters repeatedly expressed defiance and stuck to her theories — Peters was sentenced to nine years in state prison for her felony offenses.

“I am convinced you would do it all over again if you could,” U.S. District Judge Matthew Barrett told Peters at her sentencing.

“You’re as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen,” Barrett blasted. “You are no hero. You abused your position and you’re a charlatan.”

More from Law&Crime: ‘Rogue use of executive authority’: Trump DOJ rips judge for deeming Biden watchdog firing ‘illegal’ and pressures DC Circuit to respond before SCOTUS showdown

On Monday, DOJ lawyers filed a “Statement of Interest” in the District of Colorado announcing its review of Peters’ case — saying “reasonable concerns” have been raised recently regarding her conviction and incarceration.

“These concerns relate to, among other things, the exceptionally lengthy sentence imposed relative to the conduct at issue, the First Amendment implications of the trial court’s October 2024 assertions relating to Ms. Peters, and whether Colorado’s denial of bail pending appeal was arbitrary or unreasonable under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments such that relief is appropriate,” the filing said.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

USPS Driver Mistakes 10-Year-Old for ‘Porch Pirate,’ Attempts to Hit Child Returning Misdelivered Package: Police Report

Inset: William White (Escambia County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The area in Florida…

Gainesville Police Department Launches Investigation into Northeast Gainesville Shooting

The Gainesville Police Department is reaching out to the community for help…

Tragic Roommate Dispute Over Dog Ends in Fatal Shooting: A Cautionary Tale

Share An altercation between two roommates over the presence of a dog…

Reality TV Personality Chad Ollinger Asserts ‘Supernatural’ Abilities Following Cellmate’s Death Investigation

Chad Ollinger, a former reality television personality, is embroiled in a serious…

Gainesville Resident Arrested for Firing Multiple Shots in Phoenix Apartments Parking Lot

By the Staff GAINESVILLE, Fla. – On Wednesday, 31-year-old Mykell Torrence Hicks…

Bryan Kohberger’s Sister’s Ominous Warning: The Chilling Connection to Idaho Murders

Just before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, his sister expressed concern for his safety,…

Unraveling the Perfect Alibi: How a Witness Turned the Tables in a Murder Mystery

Heather Hoffman nearly executed the perfect crime. Her meticulously constructed alibi was…

Unveiling the Night Art Student Katelyn Markham Vanished: The Alibi That Unraveled

Art student Katelyn Markham was on the cusp of graduating college and…