Asylum seekers lose illegal detention bid in same court as controversial 2023 ruling
Share and Follow

An attempt to extend the scope of a controversial High Court ruling on immigration detention has failed in the same court, drawing ire from refugee advocates.

Two asylum seekers — from Poland and Vietnam — sought damages after claiming it was illegal for immigration authorities to detain them while their applications for protection visas were being processed.

Both men were taken into detention after they served prison sentences for drug offences committed in Australia.

An attempt to extend the scope of a controversial High Court ruling on immigration detention has failed in the same court. (Getty)

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal found their criminal exploits exposed them to risk of significant harm if they were deported to their home countries.

It ruled the Polish man risked being imprisoned and subjected to harmful treatment if returned home, while the Vietnamese man could be sentenced to the death penalty.

The pair maintained the tribunal’s decision meant they could not be removed from the country which meant their subsequent detention was unconstitutional.

They relied on the 2023 landmark decision in the NZYQ case, which found indefinite immigration detention was illegal if there is no reasonable prospect of the person’s removal from Australia in the foreseeable future.

However, the High Court determined the ruling did not apply if the detention of an illegal non-citizen is limited to what is necessary for visa processing or deportation purposes.

The judges found the men’s detention was mandatory while their protection visas were being processed.

Asylum Seeker Resource Centre principal solicitor Catherine Holbeche said the High Court had failed to recognise “the human consequences of its decision” and its impact on present and past detainees.

“For people seeking asylum, the experience of prolonged detention replicates past trauma, deprivation of rights and liberty from which they fled,” she said.

The decision comes after increased scrutiny on Australia’s immigration detention laws following the impactful NZYQ ruling, which led to the release of 150 immigration detainees with criminal records.

While some had serious criminal convictions, including for murder and rape, others faced less serious charges before being placed in immigration detention.

A number were arrested for allegedly reoffending after their release, sparking fierce public and political backlash.

The Polish and Vietnamese men were not among the freed cohort, but they were released in 2024.

Readers seeking support can contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or beyond blue on 1300 22 4636.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

United Nations Report Reveals Widespread Torture in Myanmar Detention Centers

This article contains references to rape and child abuse. United Nations investigators…

“Unions Push for a Four-Day Work Week: Opinions Divided”

The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) is calling for Australia to…

Maggie Beer Faces a Critical Financial Deadline for Her Aged Care Initiative

Maggie Beer has a financial deadline for her culinary mission to transform…

How the RBA’s Interest Rate Decision Affects Your Home Loan

The Reserve Bank’s interest rate cut will be felt as good news…

Missing Angler’s Boat Discovered Along NSW Shoreline

A search is under way for a fisherman who vanished in waters…

Woolworths Issues Apology After Selling Controversial $14 Deli Product: ‘Are You Serious?’

Woolworths shoppers are threatening to ‘boycott’ the supermarket chain after discovering deli meat…

McDonald’s Japan Ends Pokemon Card Happy Meal Promotion on a Sour Note

Fast-food chain McDonald’s Japan has cancelled a Happy Meal campaign that came…

ACTU Advocates for a Four-Day Work Week Prior to Productivity Summit

The Australian Council for Trade Unions (ACTU) is joining the call for…