Share and Follow
Economist Chris Richardson described both parties’ approaches as “pretty dumb”, warning that their housing pledges would only worsen inflation and fail to address Australia’s housing affordability crisis.
“Both sides are promising to give us extra money … this doesn’t make Australia more prosperous. It’s just more money, chasing the same amount of stuff [and resulting in] prices higher than they need to be,” he said.
How is housing affordability being defined?
Labor’s Housing Australia Future Fund to build 20,000 new social housing properties over five years from 2024 has been criticised for not yet delivering any new homes, although Labor has blamed delays in getting legislation passed on the Greens and Coalition.
“They’re actually about ‘accessibility’— we’ve just made it easier to get really big loans and that we call ‘housing affordability’.”
Two solutions for two different groups
Davies said the “devil in the detail” is that the policies are only for new builds.
He added that given the scale of government expenditure involved, there needed to be a longer-term strategy to ensure sustained housing accessibility and genuine affordability.
More support needed to keep up with demand
“Whoever forms government will need to apply additional direct incentives to boost state and local government supply and approval capacity, keeping the market in equilibrium, to build the homes the nation needs.”
Labor and the Coalition defend their housing plans
