AP files amended lawsuit over White House press pool ban
Share and Follow

President Donald Trump at a press conference at the White House in Washington on February 27, 2025 (Yuri Gripas/Abaca/Sipa USA; via AP Images)

A federal judge in Colorado this week appeared skeptical of allowing the Trump administration to resume using an 18th-century wartime authority to fast-track the removal of Venezuelan migrants with limited notice and minimal, if any, due process.

U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on Monday heard arguments from attorneys representing the Justice Department and immigration rights groups regarding whether she should renew a temporary restraining order (TRO) preventing the government from invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 (AEA) to deport migrants to a notorious work camp in El Salvador.

The hearing came after the U.S. Supreme Court in the early morning hours of Saturday issued an order — the first and only Saturday order issued this term — directing the government “not to remove” any immigrant detainees subject to President Donald Trump’s proclamation invoking the AEA in northern Texas.

The Saturday order follows the justices April 7 order in which they unanimously held that “AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal” under the AEA “within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs.”

In light of the high court’s ruling, an incredulous Sweeney questioned how the government could prevail in the instant case, asking the government’s attorney, “How could I not continue the temporary restraining order?” the Daily Camera reported.

Seeking to have the TRO lifted, the DOJ assured the court that any individuals subject to removal under the act would be given 24 hours to challenge their deportation before a judge, Denver CBS affiliate KCNC reported.

Attorneys from the ACLU and the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network, the organizations representing the two unnamed petitioners in the case, pushed back on the administration’s position, asserting that affording migrants only one day to file individual habeas corpus petitions could not possibly comply with the Supreme Court’s directive requiring “reasonable time” for court challenges.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Mystery Deepens as Holly Bobo’s Alleged Killer Seeks New Trial After Her Disappearance

Holly Bobo, a vibrant nursing student, vanished from her family’s home in…

Tragic Shooting Follows Heated Argument Over Dog Incident, Police Report

Inset: Sylvester Grice-Jordan (Miami-Dade Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation). Background: Home in…

Shocking Case: Man Blames Toddler’s Life-Threatening Injuries on ‘Allergic Reaction’ After Brutal Assault

Left: Howard Dewayne Walker Jr.”s mug shot. Right: Walker after his arrest…

Probation Violation: Men Caught with Drugs and Firearms

In a recent incident in Gainesville, Florida, two young men, Peyton Artavious…

Seven Preteens Charged with Battery in Shocking Viral Attack on Mother: Ages 10-13

Seven children from Illinois are facing criminal charges following an alleged attack…

Texas Woman, 70, Convicted of Murdering Elderly Partner with Poisoned Biscuits and Gravy

They say the way to a man’s heart is through his stomach,…

Shoplifter’s Gun Malfunctions During Tense Walmart Standoff with Police

Shoplifting suspect tries to shoot police officer at a Walmart in Canton,…

Controversial Mayor Cleared of Charges Vows to ‘Regain Control’ Over Family Dynamics

Left: Atlantic City Mayor Marty Small Sr. speaks at a press conference…