Trump administration asks Supreme Court to lift limits on deportations to 'third countries'
Share and Follow


WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to make it easier for officials to deport convicted criminals to ‘third countries’ that are not their nations of origin.

The administration is seeking to block an injunction issued by a federal judge in Massachusetts that said the affected immigrants nationwide should be given at least ten days to raise concerns that they may be at risk of torture, persecution or death.

Just last week, the judge said the administration had violated his previous order by flying eight migrants to South Sudan. The men are now being held in a U.S. facility in Djibouti.

All the immigrants potentially affected by the litigation are already subject to deportation, so the case hinges on what legal process they receive before they can be deported.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the new filing that the ruling by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy requires the government to undertake “an onerous set of procedures” that he had no authority to require.

“Those judicially created procedures are currently wreaking havoc on the third-country removal process. In addition to usurping the Executive’s authority over immigration policy, the injunction disrupts sensitive diplomatic, foreign-policy, and national-security efforts,” Sauer wrote.

Murphy’s April order concluded that plaintiffs were merely asking for basic due process.

“Plaintiffs are simply asking to be told they are going to be deported to a new country before they are taken to such a country, and be given an opportunity to explain why such a deportation will likely result in their persecution, torture, and/or death,” he wrote.

On Monday night, Murphy rejected a government attempt to reconsider his requirements as it relates to the men now in South Sudan.

“It turns out that having immigration proceedings on another continent is harder and more logistically cumbersome than Defendants anticipated,” he wrote.

“It continues to be this Court’s sincere hope that reason can get the better of rhetoric,” he added.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like
PICTURED: What to eat on Christmas if you're on Ozempic or biohacking

Discover Festive Feast Ideas for Ozempic Users and Biohackers This Christmas

For most people, Christmas is one of those rare occasions when dietary…
Meet the 'Most Powerful Woman in Sports' Gayle Benson

Unveiling Gayle Benson: The Trailblazing Force Redefining Power in Sports

In a Baton Rouge YMCA, just days before Christmas, Gayle Benson stands…
The same Knicks issue is rearing its head once again

Unpacking the Knicks’ Recurring Struggles: Can They Overcome Their Persistent Challenges?

The Knicks are feeling the sting of early-season challenges. They’ve consistently struggled…
Doctors blamed my baby's issues on weight... he had a brain disease

Doctors Initially Attributed My Baby’s Symptoms to Weight, Later Diagnosed Brain Disease

A mother from Kentucky alleges that medical professionals brushed off her infant’s…
Trump vows no 'Bad Santas' in America, piles praise on Christmas Eve

Trump Pledges to Keep ‘Bad Santas’ Out of America, Celebrates Christmas Eve Spirit

First Lady Melania Trump and President Donald Trump continued a cherished tradition…
NORAD continues decades-long tradition of tracking Santa's trip around the world

NORAD Keeps Holiday Magic Alive by Tracking Santa’s Global Journey

In the lead-up to Christmas, the excitement surrounding Santa Claus reaches a…
Decaying iconic movie landmark gets a new $50million lease of life

Iconic Movie Landmark Revitalized with $50 Million Restoration Plan

A historic New York City icon that featured in the film Men…
What filler REALLY does to your face: JILLIAN MICHAELS

Jillian Michaels Reveals the Surprising Effects of Facial Fillers on Your Skin

One of the most persistent misconceptions in the realm of cosmetic treatments…