Appeals court temporarily lifts judge’s block on Trump’s National Guard deployment 
Share and Follow


A federal appeals court panel late Thursday temporarily lifted a judge’s order ruling President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard illegal, enabling the troops to remain assisting with immigration raids in Los Angeles, for now. 

The ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals landed mere hours after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the president to return control of the troops to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) by Friday afternoon. 

The three-judge appeals panel is comprised of two Trump-nominated judges, Mark Bennett and Eric Miller, and Judge Jennifer Sung, an appointee of former President Biden. 

Their one-page order contained little explanation but suggests it is not a decision on the merits of the case in any way. 

Breyer, an appointee of former President Clinton who serves in San Francisco, said Trump failed to issue his order “through” Newsom as required by law and the situation on the ground didn’t present the prerequisites required for Trump to federalize the National Guard. 

“The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of ‘rebellion,’” Breyer wrote. 

His order was set to go into effect Friday afternoon. 

The Trump administration in urging the 9th Circuit to immediately intervene called the judge’s order “unprecedented” and an “extraordinary intrusion” into Trump’s authority. 

“That sort of second-guessing of the Commander in Chief’s military judgments is a gross violation of the separation of powers,” the Justice Department wrote in its motion. “Nearly 200 years ago, the Supreme Court made clear that these judgment calls are for the President to make—not a Governor, and certainly not a federal court.” 

The 9th Circuit issued its ruling before Newsom responded. His opposition was filed six minutes after the order. 

“An administrative stay is unnecessary and unwarranted in light of the district court’s extensive reasoning— in particular, its findings of irreparable harm to the State in the absence of injunctive relief. There are also serious questions regarding the appellate jurisdiction of this Court,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s (D) office wrote. 

Updated at 11:45 p.m. EDT.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like
Caitlin Clark has to be held back in heated moment with ref

Caitlin Clark Restrained During Tense Exchange with Referee

Caitlin Clark shook her head with her hands on her hips, disgusted…
Harry beams in Angola on solo trip to walk across landmine field

Harry Shines in Angola During Solo Journey to Walk Through Landmine Field

Prince Harry received a warm reception after landing in Angola to raise…
Any tie Bryan Kohberger has to 'Pappa Rodger' could become clear when gag order is lifted

Any tie Bryan Kohberger has to ‘Pappa Rodger’ could become clear when gag order is lifted

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! The mysterious figure emerged…
Caitlin Clark appears to re-injure groin in major Fever concern

Caitlin Clark Faces Potential Groin Re-Injury, Sparking Concerns for Fever

The Fever are once more concerned about Caitlin Clark’s condition. The WNBA…
Darth Vader's lightsaber from original Star Wars trilogy to be auctioned off for up to $3 million

Iconic Darth Vader Lightsaber from Star Wars Trilogy Set to Fetch Up to $3 Million at Auction

May the force — and fortunes — be with you. The lightsaber…
Teen run over by a truck while sunbathing on the beach

Teen run over by a truck while sunbathing on the beach

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! The driver of a…
Mom brutally slammed over 'narcissistic' response to pregnancy reveal

Mom harshly criticized for ‘self-absorbed’ reaction to pregnancy announcement

A woman whose mom was fiercely slammed over her ‘rude’ reaction to…
Woman accused of planning to send fentanyl-laced chocolates to ex-husband

Woman Allegedly Plotted to Send Ex-Husband Fentanyl-Tainted Chocolates

COLEMAN, Texas (WJW) – A Texas woman is facing charges after investigators…