Growing number of people accessing their super for medical treatment.
Share and Follow

A growing number of Australians are accessing their superannuation early to pay for critical medical treatment.

But there are warnings about the hidden tax trap and the impact on your retirement.

It was the week of Christmas in 2020 when Rose Charles’ life changed forever.

Growing number of people accessing their super for medical treatment.
Growing number of people accessing their super for medical treatment. (Nine)

“I didn’t ask to get cancer, I didn’t want to get cancer,” Charles said.

Sixteen rounds of chemotherapy, 30 rounds of radiation, a double mastectomy and breast reconstruction followed.

The gruelling treatment forced her to quit her job while raising a teenage son.

“You’ve still got gas bills, you’ve still got school fees,” she said.

Rose joined a growing number of Australians tapping her superannuation early to make ends meet.

“I only took out the cost of one procedure and that was $35,000,” she said.

At least 50,000 Australians accessed their super early on compassionate grounds last financial year.

In total, more than $1 billion has been approved for release. 

At least 50,000 Australians accessed their super early on compassionate grounds last financial year.
At least 50,000 Australians accessed their super early on compassionate grounds last financial year. (Nine)

“We’ve certainly seen an increase over the last 12 months, it’s about a ten per cent increase,” Aware Super general manager Peter Hogg said.

The big catch, as Charles discovered, is that you have to pay tax.

Because super is taxed favourably going in, if you pull it out before you turn 60, you have to pay the tax you skipped.

That can be up to up to 22 per cent, on top of the 15 per cent paid on your contributions on the way in to your fund.

“So the government got a fair chunk,” Charles said.

You can get a refund at the end of the financial year, if your marginal tax rate is less than 37 per cent.

The strategy comes with a warning, to think hard about sacrificing future retirement earnings, only if it’s absolutely necessary. 

“It’s quite a high rate for people who have those immediate needs we think and we think there’s probably a better way we can do it,” ASFA chief executive Mary Delahunty said.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Trump’s Appointment of Greenland Envoy Triggers Diplomatic Controversy

US President Donald Trump has named Louisiana governor Jeff Landry as his…
Bumpy road ahead for Australia's bicycle industry

Challenges Loom for Australia’s Bicycle Industry

Christmas couldn’t come fast enough for the Australian bicycle industry, which has…

Exploring Love Beyond Norms: Australian Couples Embrace Throuple Relationships

Helen, Lena and Hugh (surnames withheld) say they are three “sensitive and…
Jeffrey Epstein Larry Nassar letter

Trump Administration Denounces Epstein Letter as Fraud: Uncovering the Truth

The department had said earlier Tuesday that it was assessing the validity…
Non-terror groups that 'hate Australia' target of new reform

Australia’s New Reforms: Tackling Hostile Non-Terror Groups Head-On

An accelerated National Firearms Register and laws that would allow non-terrorist organisations…
Mosquitoes, mozzies

Severe Illness Outbreak in Australian State Raises Public Health Concerns: What You Need to Know

Travelers in Victoria have been cautioned about an uptick in cases of…
People believed trapped after US nursing home explosion

Residents Feared Trapped Following Explosion at U.S. Nursing Home

There was a gas explosion reported this morning at a nursing home…
Gregory John Walker has been charged with murder over the death of Arthur Haines in 1998.

Justice Served: Arsonist Sentenced for Tragic Death at Boy’s Sleepover

An impulsive act of rage has led to a decade-long prison sentence…