Sen Johnson: Media 'either duped or complicit' in Russia election interference 'narrative'
Share and Follow


Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) accused the media of being “either duped or complicit” on the interference of the 2016 election by Russians.

“I want the press to be honest. I want Pulitzer Prizes to be returned. They were either duped or complicit in pushing that false narrative that put America in political turmoil for years,” Johnson told NewsNation’s Blake Burman on “The Hill.” 

“It’s continuing to go on, all based on a Hillary Clinton dirty trick, the Steele Dossier that those guys knew was a dirty trick, and yet they used that to gin up the Mueller investigation, impeachments, everything else,” he added. “Listen, this is, again election interference orders of magnitude worse than anything Russia or China ever, ever could hope to achieve,” he added.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard put out a report last week alleging that Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Gabbard argued in a statement that former officials took part in a “treasonous conspiracy” and said her office was turning over evidence to the Justice Department for possible criminal referrals.

The report follows President Trump’s March memo ordering the declassification of “all files related to Crossfire Hurricane,” the name given to the FBI’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Trump has long denied that Russia influenced his successful White House bid in 2016 against Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

On Tuesday, Former President Obama denied the Trump administration’s assertions that he manipulated evidence linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,” Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement to The Hill’s sister network NewsNation.

“Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio,” he added.

The Hill has reached out to The Clinton Foundation for comment.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Morning Brief: Turning Challenges into Opportunities

Tuesday, January 20, 2026 Good morning, and welcome to RedState’s “Morning…

Donald Trump Arrives in Davos: U.S. President Heads to Switzerland Following Remarks on Starmer and NATO Allies

Donald Trump is making his way to Davos for a highly anticipated…

Chilling Words: Shocking Statement by Shooter Before Attacking Indiana Judge and Wife

The individual responsible for injuring an Indiana judge and his wife on…

Why It’s Time to Rethink Birthright Citizenship: A Comprehensive Analysis

During Monday’s episode of “Alex Marlow Show,” Peter Schweizer, a prominent contributor…

Brooklyn Beckham’s Wedding Dress Drama: Disputed Memories of Last-Minute Changes to Nicola Peltz’s Gown

Brooklyn Beckham’s recent assertion that his mother, Victoria Beckham, withdrew from designing…

Breaking News: White House Receives Controversial Insurrection Act Memo

A legal memorandum, authored by a group of retired military brass, is…

Unplugging for Productivity: Why the ‘Right to Disconnect’ Could Revolutionize Work-Life Balance in America

In today’s fast-paced business landscape, one of the most lucrative decisions companies…

California GOP Takes Redistricting Battle to Supreme Court with Emergency Appeal

In a significant legal maneuver, plaintiffs have escalated their challenge against…