Sen Johnson: Media 'either duped or complicit' in Russia election interference 'narrative'
Share and Follow


Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) accused the media of being “either duped or complicit” on the interference of the 2016 election by Russians.

“I want the press to be honest. I want Pulitzer Prizes to be returned. They were either duped or complicit in pushing that false narrative that put America in political turmoil for years,” Johnson told NewsNation’s Blake Burman on “The Hill.” 

“It’s continuing to go on, all based on a Hillary Clinton dirty trick, the Steele Dossier that those guys knew was a dirty trick, and yet they used that to gin up the Mueller investigation, impeachments, everything else,” he added. “Listen, this is, again election interference orders of magnitude worse than anything Russia or China ever, ever could hope to achieve,” he added.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard put out a report last week alleging that Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Gabbard argued in a statement that former officials took part in a “treasonous conspiracy” and said her office was turning over evidence to the Justice Department for possible criminal referrals.

The report follows President Trump’s March memo ordering the declassification of “all files related to Crossfire Hurricane,” the name given to the FBI’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Trump has long denied that Russia influenced his successful White House bid in 2016 against Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

On Tuesday, Former President Obama denied the Trump administration’s assertions that he manipulated evidence linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,” Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement to The Hill’s sister network NewsNation.

“Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio,” he added.

The Hill has reached out to The Clinton Foundation for comment.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Erika Kirk Advocates for Courtroom Transparency: Why Cameras Could Revolutionize Justice

The courtroom dynamics of the impending murder trial of the man accused…

Revolutionizing Homeownership: 50-Year Mortgage Plans in the Works Following Trump’s Announcement

Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte announced on Saturday that…

Preview of Sunday Political Shows: Ongoing Government Shutdown Sparks Intense Negotiations Between Democrats and GOP

The ongoing government shutdown has reached a historic milestone, marking 38 days…

Industry Expert Dispels Myths of Airline Chaos Amid Travel Surge

On Friday, an airline industry analyst commented on the relatively minor impacts…

Charlamagne Tha God Urges Democrats to Resolve Government Shutdown: ‘Stop Playing Politics

Charlamagne Tha God has called on Senate Democrats to take action and…

Unveiling the Afterlife: My Eye-Opening Near-Death Experiences and What I Discovered

In a remarkable story of survival and revelation, a Virginia woman who…

Pelosi’s Wealth Surge: How 38 Years in Congress Transformed Her Net Worth by 16,930% to $280 Million

Nancy Pelosi, known as “Speaker Emerita,” has announced she will not…

Thousands of Ballots Found in Maricopa County Days Post-Election: Experts Warn of Potential Errors

In Maricopa County, Arizona, an election official has downplayed the recent…