The Issue: The Post’s editorial urging President Trump to endorse Mayor Adams for re-election.

Wasn’t it the New York Post that published photographs of Mayor Adams welcoming busloads of undocumented immigrants at Port Authority (“The Post says: Endorse Adams Apple,” Editorial, Aug. 8)?

Have you already forgotten about the billions of dollars that taxpayers shelled out to house, feed and educate illegals?

Have you forgotten about all the corrupt politicians Adams surrounded himself with in his administration?

One would think The Post would do the right thing for New Yorkers and instead ask President Trump to endorse Curtis Sliwa.

Ruth Adler

The Bronx

The Post’s support for Eric Adams illustrates a lack of innovation.

New York City is primed for a change, which requires the insights of Sliwa.

Any other candidate inhabits a “business as usual” mentality.

God willing, enough people will stop the madness and give Sliwa his due.

Jonathan Kiddrane

Queens

I urge all New Yorkers to get behind Adams.

I believe that he cares about New York City and is well aware of the mistakes he has made in his first term.

Above all else, he cares about the quality-of-life issues in all five boroughs.

He does not want to brainwash us, seize property, close family businesses or make our neighborhoods less safe.

Whether you live in Chinatown, Little Italy, Forest Hills, Harlem or elsewhere, Adams will advocate for you.

Ken Karcinell

Hewlett

Adams is the greatest sleazeball since Jimmy Walker during the Roaring ’20s.

Yes, Andrew Cuomo is distasteful and Zohran Mamdani is over the moon, but going to bat for Adams indicates rabid insanity.

Doug Brin

Brooklyn

Has the New York Post lost its mind?

How, for the love of God, could you ask President Trump to endorse Adams for re-election?

Adams has been a complete disaster since his first day in office.

Cuomo and Mamdani — the despicable communist — are even worse.

Sliwa is the only viable candidate with a chance to bring some semblance of sanity back to our once-great city.

John Lucadamo

Westchester County

Although The Post rightly questions Cuomo’s performance, supporting Adams seems to ignore the fact that many of his policies are similar to those of Mamdani and Cuomo.

It would be prudent for Trump to avoid giving any endorsements to steer clear of the federal investigations that the next mayor is expected to face due to a series of outrageous campaign ideas.

Michael Mulhall

Moseley, Va.

The Issue: The possible cancellation of “The Howard Stern Show” following a dropoff in listeners.

Howard Stern lost his edge years ago when he suddenly went woke (“Bye bye booey: Staff coasting,” Aug. 10).

For most of his career, he eschewed good taste and battled critics, going out of his way to be politically incorrect.

The more outrageous he was, the funnier he got, and that earned him a tremendous following.

But, as Howard’s longtime fans know, he is driven by money.

When Stern realized his brand of humor could get him canceled, he became a soft liberal.

Bill Calvo

Brooklyn

This is not the old Howard Stern; he is kissing up to the targets, like the woke people he once hated.

I have a better opinion of Stern staffers Gary Dell’Abate and Fred Norris than I do of Stern.

He shouldn’t be offered any extension of his show.

The time to pull the plug is now.

Sheldon Fosburg

Staten Island

Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.