California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
Share and Follow


The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) plan to redistrict California’s congressional map.

“Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,” reads a brief order posted to the docket. 

Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters’ approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. 

The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election.

Republicans’ legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. 

Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting plans.

Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state’s high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the effort.

The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers’ attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats’ strategy would be “comically absurd.” 

In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is “not the end of this fight.”

“This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats’ plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,” the statement reads.

“We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,” it continued.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

White House Backs New Agreement to Resolve Schumer Shutdown

In an effort to bring an end to the longest government…

Progressive Democrats Strongly Oppose Schumer’s Shutdown Agreement

As fresh insights into a potential agreement to conclude the government…

How a Supreme Court Decision on Trump’s Tariffs Could Impact Global Trade

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating on the fate of President Trump’s…

Senate Approves Bipartisan Agreement to Conclude Schumer Shutdown, Awaits House Decision

Following an extended voting process delayed by Texas Senator John Cornyn’s…

Meet the 8 Senate Democrats Who Helped Conclude the Government Shutdown

On Sunday evening, eight members of the Senate Democratic caucus cast their…

Crowd Reacts as Trump Conducts Military Swearing-In at Commanders Game

In a surprising display of disapproval, a segment of Washington Commanders fans…

Live Updates: Senate Negotiates Weekend Shutdown Deal; Trump Scheduled to Attend Commanders Game

The Senate is set to reconvene at the Capitol this Sunday, aiming…

Discover Why Your Mailbox Will Be Empty This Tuesday: Surprising Reasons Revealed!

This year, Tuesday, November 11, carries dual importance, one of which conveniently…