California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
Share and Follow


The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) plan to redistrict California’s congressional map.

“Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,” reads a brief order posted to the docket. 

Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters’ approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. 

The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election.

Republicans’ legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. 

Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting plans.

Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state’s high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the effort.

The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers’ attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats’ strategy would be “comically absurd.” 

In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is “not the end of this fight.”

“This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats’ plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,” the statement reads.

“We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,” it continued.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Trump Unveils Key Stumbling Block in Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks During Joint Press Conference with Zelensky

On Sunday, an important meeting took place at Mar-a-Lago, often dubbed…

Adam Peaty’s Father Photographed Post-Wedding Amid Reports of Invitation with Rear Seating Arrangement

Amid the joyful celebrations of Adam Peaty and Holly Ramsay’s recent nuptials,…

California Dismisses Lawsuit Against Trump Administration Over High-Speed Rail Funding Cut

California has decided to withdraw its lawsuit against the Trump administration, which…

Zohran Mamdani’s Apartment Hits Market: Here’s What You Need to Know About Its Price as He Prepares for Mayoral Move

Many people understand the potential pitfalls of socialism, recognizing it as…

Trump Hosts Zelensky at Mar-a-Lago: Insights into Putin’s Peace Intentions

During a meeting at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, former President Donald…

Michigan Crackdown: Eight Arrested in Major Stolen Auto Export Scandal

For decades, Detroit earned its reputation as the iconic Motor City,…

Massive Gas Line Blast Forces Closure of 5 Freeway Near Castaic

The bustling I-5 Freeway near Castaic, California, came to an abrupt halt…

Unbelievable Car Collision: Illegal Alien’s Unexpected Victim Revealed!

Unusual incidents involving undocumented immigrants often make headlines, but this recent…