Share and Follow
Candace Owens delivered an emotional episode on her show, addressing the assassination of her friend Charlie Kirk and accusing individuals of spreading lies and misrepresentations about his final days.
Owens said, “There’s a lot of lies that are being put out there and narratives that I would say are half truths or just misrepresentations entirely.” She claimed Kirk underwent a Zionist-led intervention in the Hamptons to silence his growing criticisms of Israel, part of a spiritual transformation in his life.
Owens’ passion stemmed from grief, viewing Kirk’s death as a public execution. She highlighted how people were inappropriately speaking for Kirk, positioning herself as a guardian of his true legacy.
This revelation adds to speculations about foreign influence, aligning with reports of Kirk’s fears of pro-Israel backlash. Owens’ anger at deceptive narratives underscores a broader fight for truth in a polarized political climate.
The intervention, she implied, reflected attempts to control Kirk’s evolving stance on Israel.
Owens’ Grief and Anger
Candace Owens described her profound grief over Charlie Kirk’s assassination, weeping not just for him but for the tragedy’s impact. Owens said, “I didn’t just cry. I wept. I wept for Charlie.” She rejected celebratory reactions, calling them ungodly and stressing Kirk’s humanity as a father and husband.
Her anger targeted false narratives, tempered by prayer and confession. Owens said, “The audacity of some people. It has taken much restraint and prayer and I had to speak with a priest.” She admitted struggling with vengeance but vowed to expose the truth, framing Kirk’s death as a galvanizing moment for truth-seekers. This resolve highlights her defiance against pressures to remain silent.
The Hamptons Intervention
Candace Owens claimed Charlie Kirk faced a Zionist-staged intervention in the Hamptons to halt his Israel criticisms, part of his spiritual transformation. Owens said, “Charlie was going through a spiritual transformation at the end and all of the usual suspects were really angry that I hinted towards that.”
She portrayed Kirk’s fight for autonomy using Kanye West’s “Power” as a metaphor. Owens said, “Charlie was fighting for custody of himself.” The intervention aimed to suppress his shift, reflecting external control over his views.
Owens emphasized Kirk’s last interview with Ben Shapiro, where he challenged Israel censorship.
Charlie Kirk’s now final interview: he criticised Israel to Ben Shapiro’s face pic.twitter.com/M94OTcDf7f
— HatsOff (@HatsOffff) September 11, 2025
Owens Calls Out Deceptive Narratives
Candace Owens accused individuals of inappropriately speaking for Charlie Kirk, spreading lies about his beliefs. Owens said, “People that are coming forward and saying this is what he thought and this is how he should be remembered. It just feels really inappropriate to me.”
She expressed defiance against threats and lawsuits, vowing to reveal everything. Owens said, “I’ll expose everything… Just tell the truth for once in your miserable lives.” Owens admitted her struggle with vengeance but sought restraint through faith. Owens said, “Mine is vengeance. I have to work on that.”
Conclusion
Candace Owens’ claims of a Zionist intervention in the Hamptons reflect foreign influence attempting to silence Charlie Kirk’s spiritual transformation and Israel criticisms, potentially contributing to his assassination. Owens said, “The truth is going to win. The truth is going to come out.”
From an anti-globalist view, this exposes elite-driven narratives subverting Kirk’s legacy to maintain control. Independent investigations are essential to reveal the facts, supporting truth-tellers like Owens against deceptive forces.
Full Episode Chapters:
