Appeals court rules against Trump in birthright citizenship battle
Share and Follow


(The Hill) — A federal appeals court ruled against President Trump on Friday, barring the administration from ending birthright citizenship.

The three-judge panel on the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district court injunction that barred the administration from enacting a January executive order, signed by the president, that would curtail birthright citizenship. 

“The ‘lessons of history’ thus give us every reason to be wary of now blessing this most recent effort to break with our established tradition of recognizing birthright citizenship and to make citizenship depend on the actions of one’s parents rather than — in all but the rarest of circumstances — the simple fact of being born in the United States,” the court wrote in the 100-page ruling.

The federal appeals court in Boston became the latest court to say that the president’s push to end birthright citizenship, which states that anyone born in the U.S. are citizens regardless of their parents’ immigration status, is likely unlawful. 

“Our nation’s history of efforts to restrict birthright citizenship — from Dred Scott in the decade before the Civil War to the attempted justification for the enforcement of the Chinese Exclusion Act in Wong Kim Ark — has not been a proud one,” the court’s top judge wrote in the ruling. 

The latest appeals court decision marks the fifth federal court since June to either issue or uphold orders blocking Trump’s order, just one part of his robust immigration agenda since returning to the Oval Office.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta welcomed the ruling in a post online.

“Today’s decision upholds a nationwide injunction in our lawsuit challenging the President’s attempt to end, with the stroke of a pen, the constitutional right to birthright citizenship,’ Bonta wrote Friday on social platform X.

He added, “We will continue to oppose this executive order until the President’s attempt to unmake the Constitution is blocked completely.”

The Golden State was among the 20 states included in the lawsuit.

Late last month, the Department of Justice asked the Supreme Court to review whether Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship is constitutional. 

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Decatur Man’s Serious Charge Dropped in Fatal DUI Case: What It Means for Justice

A Decatur man, previously charged with fatally hitting a 12-year-old cyclist while…

New Zealand Man Allegedly Consumes Faberge Pendant Modeled After Bond Film, as Authorities Await Proof

WELLINGTON – In a rather unusual case in New Zealand, authorities find…

University of Illinois Secures $1M FDA Grant to Revolutionize Foodborne Illness Research

CHAMPAIGN-URBANA, Ill. (WCIA) — The University of Illinois has been awarded a…

Bad Bunny and Joe Rogan Dominate Spotify Wrapped 2025 Rankings

Spotify’s 2025 Wrapped report has crowned Bad Bunny as the most-streamed artist…

Europeans Call Out Putin’s Alleged Peace Posturing Following US Envoy Discussions

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Accusations flew as Ukraine and its European partners…

New Bill Proposes to Limit DeSantis’ Authority on Immigration Policies

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (WFLA) — In Tallahassee, the debate over immigration policy is…

North Augusta Celebrates the Season with Annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony

NORTH AUGUSTA, S.C. () – North Augusta ushered in the holiday spirit…

Georgia Schedules Execution for 2003 Double Murder Convict of Real Estate Agents

In Georgia, plans are underway for the execution of a man found…