With the political stakes high, the outcome of this debate could influence future legislative battles and shape the landscape of government aid. The discussions are expected to continue as both sides strive to balance fiscal constraints with the needs of vulnerable populations.

The battle over food stamps has emerged as the latest flashpoint in the fierce partisan clash over government spending, The Hill’s Mike Lillis reports.  

© Nam Y. Huh, The Associated Press

The Trump administration warns the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which helps feed more than 40 million people, will start to run out of funds Nov. 1.  

Administration officials and congressional Republicans say Democrats, by opposing the GOP’s stopgap spending bill, are threatening undue harm to some of the nation’s poorest people. At least two dozen states are planning to cut off coverage when the funding expires. 

A big question looming over the debate remains how the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the agency that oversees SNAP from Washington, intends to manage the program in the coming weeks. 

The Trump administration has selectively funded certain programs and agencies in questionably constitutional ways that aim to help their allies. So far, there’s no indication that will happen at the USDA. 

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins warned last week that the department lacks the funds “to provide SNAP for 40 million Americans come Nov. 1.” 

But the USDA has not clarified whether it intends to tap a SNAP contingency fund to pay benefits during the shutdown. That fund currently contains between $5 billion and $6 billion, according to advocates and congressional aides who monitor the issue. 

That money would allow for partial payments to help defray grocery costs through the shutdown. Advocates also say the administration could use its legal transfer authority to supplement the contingency reserves, a strategy the administration has already used to pay military personnel and fill a shortfall under a separate federal nutrition program for women, infants and children, known as WIC. 

Welcome to The Hill’s Health Care newsletter, we’re Nathaniel Weixel and Joseph Choi — every week we follow the latest moves on how Washington impacts your health.

Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here.

Essential Reads 

How policy will be impacting the health care sector this week and beyond:

Planned Parenthood moves to block Medicaid termination in Ohio

Health activists ramp up war on processed foods amid MAHA movement

Kim Kardashian diagnosed with a brain aneurysm: What is it?

In Other News 

Branch out with a different read:

Federal judge strikes Biden-era ban on transgender care discrimination

A federal judge on Wednesday struck down a former President Biden-era rule that extended federal health antidiscrimination protections to transgender health care.  Judge Louis Guirola Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi ruled in favor of a coalition of 15 GOP-led states that sued over the rule, which broadened sex discrimination by adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the list …

Around the Nation 

Local and state headlines on health care:

What We’re Reading 

Health news we’ve flagged from other outlets:

What People Think 

Opinions related to health submitted to The Hill: