As the tenuous ceasefire in Gaza persists, a novel proposal to bifurcate the Strip into two distinct sectors is gathering momentum. One segment would remain under the influence of Hamas, while the other would showcase a prospective future free from the militant group’s control.

With Arab nations indicating a reluctance to finance rebuilding efforts while Hamas governs, U.S. and Israeli authorities are contemplating a different strategy. This involves revitalizing regions of Gaza that remain under Israeli jurisdiction, delineated by what Israeli officials refer to as the “yellow line.”

Experts suggest that this initiative aims to establish a tangible model of peace and renewal, potentially inspiring transformation within areas still dominated by Hamas.

The territories under Israeli control demarcated by the “yellow line” encompass about 58% of the Gaza Strip, including the entirety of Rafah in the south, significant portions of Khan Younis, and northern areas such as Beit Lahia and Shujaiyya. Meanwhile, Hamas retains authority over the rest, including the densely populated Gaza City. Although Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) are present, Hamas operatives continue to operate near these frontlines.

The IDF has stated that, in alignment with the ceasefire agreement and directives from the political echelon, troops from the Southern Command have commenced marking the Yellow Line in the Gaza Strip to provide tactical clarity on the ground.

John Spencer, executive director of the Urban Warfare Institute, described the plan to divide Gaza into two distinct zones — one under Israeli control and the other under Hamas — allowing rebuilding only on the Israeli side both a “practical and psychological test, a way to show Gazans what life could look like without Hamas.”

Spencer used the term “Disneyland strategy” to describe the concept, which he said was drawn from U.S. counterinsurgency efforts in Iraq.

“You take any piece of the problem — here we’re talking about terrain — and you clear out all the bad: Hamas, tunnels, weapons, everything,” he said. “Then you let civilians in, and you build something new — markets, buildings, schools, electricity. We called it Disneyland because we wanted it to look like hope — like the future.”

He said the idea follows the “clear, hold, build” model used in Iraq and Afghanistan, where troops secured neighborhoods one by one. 

“In Ramadi, we did it neighborhood by neighborhood until we covered the whole city,” he said. “You hold it, clear it, let the locals take over. It’s historically proven. You don’t have to rid Gaza of Hamas to start this.”

The goal, Spencer said, is to give Gazans — and the world — a tangible glimpse of life without Hamas.

Days after a ceasefire took effect, Gazans shop in a market in central Gaza Oct. 18, 2025. (TPS-IL)

“You build a little piece of goodness, a little Disneyland, to show everybody what’s possible,” he said. “It would also show the countries that are going to provide stabilization forces something they could be doing — stabilizing cleared areas that don’t have Hamas in them.”

Still, he cautioned the concept is no silver bullet. 

“You will have areas on the other side of the line where Hamas thinks they have control,” he said. “Building something without Hamas is as important to defeating Hamas as it is to showing people there’s a future.”

Inside Hamas-controlled Gaza, fear still defines daily life. 

“Since the start of the ceasefire, we are terrified,” one resident told Fox News Digital, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.

“We don’t want to stay under Hamas. It’s very terrifying for us to hear that Jared Kushner said reconstruction will only take place in the areas Hamas does not control. Trump and Netanyahu said Hamas will end, but look what’s happening. They are back, stronger, and we are still trapped.

In this still from a verified social media video confirmed to Reuters by a Hamas source, seven men are forced to their knees and shot from behind by Hamas gunmen during public executions in Gaza Oct. 14, 2025. (Reuters)

“There is plenty of food. Yes, in the markets, food is available, all kinds of food,” he continued. “All merchandise is available again, and prices are becoming lower and lower. Life is back, but destruction is what we see everywhere.”

For some on this side of the yellow line, the prospect of rebuilding a new Gaza on the other side — even a small one — feels like freedom.

Hussam al-Astal, who leads an anti-Hamas militia in Khan Younis, told Fox News Digital, “We do not seek to rule Gaza, nor do we seek power. Our project, after the rule and collapse of the Hamas-ISIS government, is to secure the people and move them through the transitional phase … to civilian institutions that govern in a way that pleases God, far from their personal interests.”

Hamas terrorists emerge in a show of strength escorting Red Cross vehicles carrying three Israeli hostages to be released as part of the ceasefire deal.  (TPS-IL)

He accused Hamas of turning its guns inward during the ceasefire. 

“We demand the entire international community protect us from Hamas’ terror,” he said. “We’re not fighting for someone’s rule. We are fighting for a dignified life. We fight for a new Gaza.”

Multiple sources say Israel has already offered limited support to al-Astal and other anti-Hamas factions on the ground.

“We saw a preview when the Majayda clan, in consort with anti-Hamas fighter Hussam al-Astal and aided by the IDF from the air, repelled Hamas in a localized battle,” Joseph Braude, president of the Center for Peace Communications, told Fox News Digital. “That’s a small example of what’s likely to happen more broadly — local forces, backed by Israel, pushing out Hamas from the ground up.”

Spencer and Braude agree that the emerging “two Gazas” reality isn’t accidental. It’s built into the Trump administration’s 20-point plan.

People carry boxes of relief supplies from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation as displaced Palestinians return from an aid distribution center in the central Gaza Strip June. 8, 2025. (Eyad Baba/AFP via Getty Images)

“We are approaching a new reality in which it’s feasible for reconstruction to begin in a portion of the Strip — the areas behind the yellow line — while fighting continues in the rest of Gaza,” Braude said. “Hamas is not a party to the peace process but a belligerent actor. Reconstruction is not contingent on Hamas’ cooperation. It begins where Hamas can no longer operate, while the effort to eliminate its presence continues in other parts of the Strip.”

Braude said the plan envisions “nascent enclaves of self-rule that gradually evolve into a coalition — the foundation for what could be called a Gazan Interim Transitional Authority.”

He concluded, “Developing local fighting forces to counter Hamas is a capacity Gazans welcome and Israel and its allies have,” he said. “Building a functioning government with continuity, a rules-based system, and institutions — that’s the harder work.”