In a significant development on Capitol Hill, the House is poised to vote this Tuesday on a bill that mandates the Justice Department to make public its files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier whose life and controversial death continue to captivate public interest. This vote culminates a prolonged and determined effort that has successfully navigated past considerable opposition from both former President Donald Trump and key Republican leaders.

The initiative began back in July, when a small, bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced a petition to bypass House Speaker Mike Johnson’s tight grip on legislative priorities, aiming to bring the Epstein files bill to the floor. Initially perceived as a long shot, the effort faced skepticism, especially as Trump labeled it a “hoax” and urged his supporters to disregard it. However, despite these challenges, both Trump and Johnson were unable to thwart the bill’s progress.

In a notable shift, President Trump has since acknowledged the strong momentum behind the bill, encouraging Republicans to support it. His endorsement significantly boosts the likelihood of the House passing the bill with substantial backing, thereby amplifying the pressure on the Senate to act on the matter.

On Monday, Trump stated his willingness to sign the legislation should it clear both the House and the Senate, urging, “Let the Senate look at it.”

The impending vote also strengthens the calls for transparency from the Justice Department regarding Epstein’s case. The financier, who was well-connected in elite circles, died by suicide in a Manhattan jail in 2019 while facing charges of sexually abusing and trafficking underage girls. The release of these files could shed more light on the circumstances surrounding his life and death.

A separate investigation conducted by the House Oversight Committee has released thousands of pages of emails and other documents from Epstein’s estate, showing his connections to global leaders, Wall Street powerbrokers, influential political figures and Trump himself.

Trump’s reversal on the Epstein files

Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein years ago, but tried for months to move past the demands for disclosure. On Monday, he told reporters that Epstein was connected to more Democrats and that he didn’t want the Epstein files to “detract from the great success of the Republican Party.”

Still, many in the Republican base have continued to demand the release of the files. Adding to that pressure, several survivors of Epstein’s abuse will appear on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning to push for release of the files. They also met with Johnson and rallied outside the Capitol in September, but have had to wait two months for the vote.

That’s because Johnson kept the House closed for legislative business for nearly two months and also refused to swear-in Democratic Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona during the government shutdown. After winning a special election on Sept. 23, Grijalva had pledged to provide the crucial 218th vote to the petition for the Epstein files bill. But only after she was sworn into office last week could she sign her name to the discharge petition to give it majority support in the 435-member House.

It quickly became apparent the bill would pass, and both Johnson and Trump began to fold. Trump on Sunday said Republicans should vote for the bill.

Rep. Thomas Massie, the Kentucky Republican who sponsored the bill alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, said Trump “got tired of me winning. He wanted to join.”

How Johnson is handling the bill

Rather than waiting until next week for the discharge position to officially take effect, Johnson is moving to hold the vote this week. He indicated the legislation will be brought to the House floor under a procedure that requires a two-thirds majority.

“I think it’s going to be an important vote to continue to show the transparency that we’ve delivered,” House Republican leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said Monday night.

House Democrats celebrated the vote as a rare win for the minority.

“It’s a complete and total surrender, because as Democrats we made clear from the very beginning, the survivors and the American people deserve full and complete transparency as it relates to the lives that were ruined by Jeffrey Epstein,” said House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries.

What will the Senate do?

Still, it’s not clear how the Senate will handle the bill.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has previously been circumspect when asked about the legislation and instead said he trusted the Justice Department to release information on the Epstein investigation.

But what the Justice Department has released so far under Trump was mostly already public. The bill would go further, forcing the release within 30 days of all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information about the investigation into his death in federal prison. Information about Epstein’s victims or continuing federal investigations would be allowed to be redacted, but not information due to “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”

Johnson also suggested that he would like to see the Senate amend the bill to protect the information of “victims and whistleblowers.”

But Massie said the Senate should take into account the public clamor that forced both Trump and Johnson to back down.

“If it’s anything but a genuine effort to make it better and stronger, it’ll backfire on the senators if they muck it up,” Massie said.