Kilmar Abrego Garcia freed from federal immigration detention on judge’s order and returns home
Share and Follow


PHILIPSBURG, Pa. — Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been released from immigration detention following a judge’s order on Thursday, marking a significant win for the immigrant whose controversial deportation to a notorious prison in El Salvador highlighted the Trump administration’s stringent immigration policies.

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, based in Maryland, instructed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to release Abrego Garcia immediately. She stated that his re-arrest upon returning to the United States lacked any legal justification.

After his release, Abrego Garcia returned to his Maryland home, clad in a white shirt and orange hat. His release came just hours before the 5 p.m. deadline set by the judge for the government to update on his status. Having originally entered the U.S. illegally as a teenager, Abrego Garcia has since established a life in Maryland, where he resides with his American wife and child.

Previously, he was detained at the Moshannon Valley Processing Center, located roughly 115 miles (185 kilometers) northeast of Pittsburgh.

His attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, expressed uncertainty about the next steps but confirmed his readiness to challenge any further deportation attempts against his client.

“The government still has plenty of tools in their toolbox, plenty of tricks up their sleeve,” Sandoval-Moshenberg said, adding he fully expects the government to again take steps to deport his client. “We’re going to be there to fight to make sure there is a fair trial.”

The Department of Homeland Security sharply criticized the judge’s decision and vowed to appeal, calling the ruling “naked judicial activism” by a judge appointed during the Obama administration.

“This order lacks any valid legal basis, and we will continue to fight this tooth and nail in the courts,” said Tricia McLaughlin, the department’s assistant secretary.

Sandoval-Moshenberg said the judge made it clear that the government can’t detain someone indefinitely without legal authority and that his client “has endured more than anyone should ever have to.”

An immigration judge ruled in 2019 that Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national, could not be deported to El Salvador because he faced danger from a gang that targeted his family. When he was mistakenly sent there in March, his case became a rallying point for those who oppose President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement actions.

A court later ordered his return to the United States. Since he cannot be removed to El Salvador, ICE has been seeking to deport him to a series of African countries. His federal suit claims the Trump administration is illegally using the removal process to punish Abrego Garcia for the public embarrassment caused by his deportation.

In her order releasing Abrego Garcia, Xinis wrote that federal authorities “did not just stonewall” the court, “They affirmatively misled the tribunal.” The judge was referencing the successive list of four African countries that officials had sought to remove Abrego Garcia to, seemingly without commitments from those countries, as well as officials’ affirmations that Costa Rica withdrew its offer to accept him, a claim later proven untrue.

“But Costa Rica had never wavered in its commitment to receive Abrego Garcia, just as Abrego Garcia never wavered in his commitment to resettle there,” the judge wrote.

Xinis also rejected the government’s argument that she lacked jurisdiction to intervene on a final removal order for Abrego Garcia, because she found no final order had been filed.

Separately, Abrego Garcia is asking an immigration court to reopen his case so he can seek asylum in the United States.

He is also criminally charged in Tennessee, where he has pleaded not guilty to human smuggling. He has asked the federal court to dismiss the case, arguing the prosecution is vindictive. His defense attorney in Tennessee, Sean Hecker, declined to comment.

A judge in that case has ordered an evidentiary hearing after previously finding some evidence that the charges “may be vindictive.” The judge also noted several statements by Trump administration officials that “raise cause for concern,” including a statement by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche that seemed to suggest the Justice Department charged Abrego Garcia because he won his wrongful deportation case. ___

Loller reported from Nashville and Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press reporters Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington and Claudia Lauer in Philadelphia contributed to this report.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Urgent Alert: Leesburg Water Main Break Triggers Boil Water Advisory for Hundreds – What You Need to Know

LEESBURG, Fla. – Authorities in Leesburg have issued a boil water advisory…

Storm Team 3 Forecast: Mild Weekend Weather Gives Way to Next Week’s Bitter Cold Snap

SAVANNAH, Ga. — Significant shifts in the weather are anticipated for the…

Kingsport Resident Allegedly Evades Authorities, Collides with Washington County Home

A dramatic pursuit unfolded in Washington County, Tenn., when a Kingsport man…

Trump Takes Bold Stance Against State AI Regulations with New Executive Order

In a notable move Thursday evening, President Trump signed an executive order…

Maroa-Forsyth’s Star Braden Earns WCIA 3 Athlete of the Week Honors

MAROA, Ill. (WCIA) — Avery Braden has shattered a long-standing record at…

RCSO Seeks Augusta Woman in Connection with Aggravated Assault Incident

RICHMOND COUNTY, Ga. – The Richmond County Sheriff’s Office is currently on…

Justice Department Unable to Re-Indict New York Attorney General Letitia James, According to AP Source

ALEXANDRIA, Va. – In a significant development, a grand jury has once…

Legal Battle Erupts Over New Drilling Project in Alaska Petroleum Reserve

JUNEAU, Alaska – A coalition of conservation groups and an Iñupiat-aligned organization…