Share and Follow

A Senate Republican has introduced SB 482, a legislative measure designed to safeguard individuals from the potential pitfalls of artificial intelligence, despite efforts by former President Trump to curb state regulations on such issues.
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Senator Tom Leek, representing Ormond Beach, has put forth what is being called the “Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights,” aligning with a key initiative of Governor Ron DeSantis.
This newly proposed legislation, SB 482, seeks to implement safeguards such as shielding minors from potentially damaging content. It follows Governor DeSantis’s push for a robust AI bill of rights and stands in contrast to President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at limiting disparate state regulations over this rapidly advancing technology.
Scheduled for consideration in the legislative session commencing on January 13, Leek’s bill aims to address several critical areas. It proposes to empower parents with control over their children’s engagement with AI, mandates transparency regarding communication with AI versus humans, and outlines regulations concerning the unauthorized use of personal identifiers like names and images.
Furthermore, the bill stipulates that the public must be informed if political ads are partially or fully created using AI. It also seeks to restrict Florida’s government agencies from partnering with AI companies linked to nations deemed as “foreign countries of concern,” such as China and Russia.
Trump has drawn widespread attention for trying to curb state regulations on AI. But during a Dec. 15 appearance in Jupiter, DeSantis expressed confidence Florida could go forward with his proposals and that state legislation would withstand a federal legal challenge.
“Even reading it (Trump’s order) very broadly, I think the stuff we’re doing is going to be very consistent,” DeSantis said. “But irrespective, clearly, we have a right to do this.”
Rather than preempting state laws, Trump’s Dec. 11 directive required the U.S. Department of Justice to create an “AI Litigation Council” to review “onerous” state laws that don’t align with the White House’s positions. States not in alignment could become ineligible for money intended to expand high-speed internet or face lawsuits.
DeSantis has also called for legislation to try to prevent Floridians from getting hit with costs related to massive data centers needed for AI and other technology. He also wants to allow local governments to reject development of the centers, which require large amounts of electricity and water.
Katie Betta, a spokeswoman for Senate President Ben Albritton, R-Wauchula, acknowledged in an email Monday that a separate bill is in the works about data centers.
Leek’s bill came after Rep. Christine Hunschofsky, D-Parkland, filed a bill (HB 659) this month that includes requiring that users be notified when they are interacting with AI “companion chatbots,” with the notices required to say the chatbots “may not be suitable for some minors.”
“Increasingly, we are seeing heartbreaking cases where young people form deep emotional bonds with AI companions that end up pushing them further toward self-harm,” Hunschofsky said in a prepared statement Friday.
DeSantis and lawmakers in recent years have passed two high-profile bills that put restrictions on online platforms — with both measures leading to ongoing legal battles.
The tech industry groups NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association are challenging a 2021 law that includes preventing platforms from banning political candidates from their sites and requiring companies to publish — and apply consistently — standards about issues such as banning users or blocking their content. DeSantis and the Republican-controlled Legislature passed the law after Facebook and Twitter, now known as X, blocked Trump from their platforms after his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association also are fighting a 2024 law designed to prevent children from having access to certain social-media sites. They argue the law violates the First Amendment.
The law prevents children under age 14 from opening accounts on certain platforms — which court documents indicate could include platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube. Parents would have to give consent for 14- and 15-year-olds to have accounts on the platforms.
This article was provided by the News Service of Florida (NSF).