Democrats Criticize White House Proposal on ICE as ‘Insufficient’ Amid Looming Homeland Security Funding Deadline

WASHINGTON – Democratic leaders have expressed strong dissatisfaction with a recent proposal from the White House, labeling it as “incomplete and insufficient.” Their discontent stems from a demand for more stringent checks on President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement, which could lead to a potential shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security.

In a statement released late Monday, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized the White House’s counterproposal to their weekend list of demands. They noted that the proposal was vague, lacking both specifics and legislative text, and failed to address the widespread concerns over ICE’s controversial operations. The details of the White House proposal have not been made public.

With the clock ticking towards another partial government shutdown, set to start Saturday, Democrats are pushing for significant changes. Their demands include requiring judicial warrants, improving identification for DHS officers, establishing new use-of-force standards, and eliminating racial profiling. These changes have been deemed crucial following the fatal shooting of two protesters by federal agents in Minneapolis last month.

Despite the tense atmosphere, earlier on Monday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, expressed a more optimistic view of the ongoing negotiations between Democrats and the White House. According to Thune, the fact that both parties are actively exchanging proposals indicates “forward progress” and holds the potential for reaching a mutually acceptable compromise.

Thune remarked positively on the exchange of documents between both sides, suggesting that this interaction could pave the way for finding common ground.

But coming to an agreement on the charged issue of immigration enforcement will be difficult, especially as rank-and-file lawmakers in both parties were skeptical about finding common ground.

Republicans have balked at the Democrats’ requests and some have demands of their own, including the addition of legislation that would require proof of citizenship before Americans register to vote and restrictions on cities that they say do not do enough to crack down on illegal immigration.

And many Democrats who are furious about Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s aggressive crackdown have said they won’t vote for another penny of Homeland Security funding until enforcement is radically scaled back.

“Dramatic changes are needed at the Department of Homeland Security before a DHS funding bill moves forward,” Jeffries said earlier Monday. “Period. Full stop.”

Trump deals with Democrats

Congress is trying to renegotiate the DHS spending bill after Trump agreed to a Democratic request that it be separated out from a larger spending measure that became law last week. That package extended Homeland Security funding at current levels only through Feb. 13, creating a brief window for action as the two parties discuss new restrictions on ICE and other federal officers.

Democrats made the demands for new restrictions on ICE and other federal law enforcement after ICU nurse Alex Pretti was shot and killed by a U.S. Border Patrol officer in Minneapolis on Jan. 24, and some Republicans suggested that new restrictions were necessary. Renee Good was shot by ICE agents on Jan. 7.

While he agreed to separate the funding, Trump has not publicly responded to the Democrats’ specific demands.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said late last week that the Trump administration is willing to discuss some items on the Democrats’ list, but “others don’t seem like they are grounded in any common sense, and they are nonstarters for this administration.”

Democratic demands

Schumer and Jeffries have said they want immigration officers to remove their masks, to show identification and to better coordinate with local authorities. They have also demanded a stricter use-of-force policy for the federal officers, legal safeguards at detention centers and a prohibition on tracking protesters with body-worn cameras.

Among other demands, Democrats say Congress should end indiscriminate arrests, “improve warrant procedures and standards,” ensure the law is clear that officers cannot enter private property without a judicial warrant and require that before a person can be detained, it’s verified that the person is not a U.S. citizen.

Republicans have said they support the requirement for DHS officers to have body-worn cameras — language that was in the original DHS bill — but have balked at many of the other Democratic asks.

“Taking the masks off ICE officers and agents, the reason we can’t do that is that it would subject them to great harm, their families at great risk because people are doxing them and targeting them,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Monday. “We’ve got to talk about things that are reasonable and achievable.”

Tennessee Sen. Bill Hagerty said on “Fox News Sunday” that Democrats are ”trying to motivate a radical left base.”

“The left has gone completely overboard, and they’re threatening the safety and security of our agents so they cannot do their job,” Hagerty said.

Consequences of a shutdown

In addition to ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the homeland security bill includes funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Transportation Security Administration. If DHS shuts down, Thune said last week, “there’s a very good chance we could see more travel problems” similar to the 43-day government closure last year.

Lawmakers in both parties have suggested they could separate out funding for ICE and Border Patrol and pass the rest of it by Friday. But Thune has been cool to that idea, saying instead that Congress should pass another short-term extension for all of DHS while they negotiate the possible new restrictions.

“If there’s additional time that’s needed, then hopefully Democrats would be amenable to another extension,” Thune said.

Many Democrats are unlikely to vote for another extension. But Republicans could potentially win enough votes in both chambers from Democrats if they feel hopeful about negotiations.

“The ball is in the Republicans’ court,” Jeffries said Monday.

___

Associated Press writers Joey Cappelletti and Lisa Mascaro contributed to this report.