Gallery Owner Once Loved by Art Elite Now Faces a Reckoning

A gallerist who built his reputation around supporting marginalized artists is facing allegations that he exploited some of the very creators he pledged to...
HomeUSLindsay Clancy Holdout Juror’s Attorney Rejects Law Defiance Claim

Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror’s Attorney Rejects Law Defiance Claim

The attorney representing the lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial is rejecting the suggestion that his client refused to apply the law. Speaking with Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany, attorney Edward Paltzik said juror Michael P. Desronvil had no uncertainty about his decision.

In a preview of an interview scheduled to air Monday on “Fox & Friends,” McEnany asked Paltzik whether Desronvil had ever experienced reasonable doubt. The question followed a note from the jury foreperson accusing the juror of refusing to follow the judge’s instructions on the legal standard.

“Michael had zero doubt,” Paltzik said.

Attorney Edward Paltzik, who represents Michael Desronvil, the holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial

Attorney Edward Paltzik represents Michael Desronvil, the lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial. (Fox News)

“Zero doubt. No doubt. And he had evidence to back up his position?” McEnany responded.

“A lot of evidence. A mountain of evidence,” Paltzik replied.

A man in a plaid shirt sits and cradles a sleeping infant wrapped in a pink blanket.

Michael P. Desronvil, the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, which ended in a mistrial. (Fugitive TV)

Desronvil remained the only juror seeking a conviction after seven days of deliberations in Clancy’s trial. The other 11 jurors were prepared to find the former labor and delivery nurse not criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on Sept. 4.

Clancy acknowledged killing 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan at the family’s home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in January 2023. Her defense maintained that postpartum psychosis made her not criminally responsible for the killings. Prosecutors argued that Clancy understood her actions and deliberately planned the deaths.

Lindsay Clancy listens to testimony in Plymouth Superior Court.

Lindsay Clancy in court last month. (Boston Globe via Getty Images)

Desronvil later said he believed the physical evidence and witness testimony demonstrated that Clancy knew what she was doing. Prosecutors have not said whether they plan to retry the case. Clancy is scheduled to return to court on Sept. 29.

McEnany’s full interview with Paltzik will air Monday on “Fox & Friends.”