Share and Follow
The former Liberal staffer, now disgraced, had initiated a defamation lawsuit against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson. The case revolved around a 2021 interview on The Project where Brittany Higgins alleged that he had raped her.
In April 2024, Justice Michael Lee concluded that, based on the balance of probabilities, Lehrmann did indeed assault Higgins in Parliament House in 2019 following an evening out.
This judgment was upheld by the full bench of the Federal Court just yesterday.
Brittany Higgins expressed her relief over the ruling through a statement shared on social media.
“At last, I feel like I can breathe again,” she wrote on Instagram, extending her gratitude to the court for its verdict.
“While on the face of it this was a defamation case against a media outlet, in reality this was once again a rape trial.
“I cannot begin to tell you how retraumatising it is to have your rapist weaponise the legal system against you for daring to speak out.
“Sadly, this isn’t uncommon. It’s a legal tactic that is being increasingly used around the world by perpetrators in a bid to sue victim-survivors into silence as a direct response to the #MeToo movement.”
Lehrmann has always denied he sexually assaulted Higgins, and a criminal case against him in 2022 was abandoned without any findings.
He did not appear in court yesterday and was represented by lawyer Zali Burrows, who said he was “overwhelmed” by the decision and was seeking advice on applying for special leave to contest the decision in the High Court.
Lehrmann was directed to pay $2 million in damages after his initial defamation loss, and he must now also foot the bill for the legal costs of his opponents during his unsuccessful appeal.
The 30-year-old had another court matter today, this time in Hobart, over a November 2024 incident where he absconded with a Toyota Prado.
The matter was heard before magistrate Robert Webster in a “contest mention” hearing, with most content suppressed.
Prosecutor Bunewat Keo advised the court that a previous charge of car theft had been downgraded to driving without consent.
While Burrows attended court, Lehrmann was not sighted – contrary to an order last month from Webster that he must appear or risk arrest.
Prior to the hearing, Burrows told waiting journalists that her client was “not in a good way”, asking for compassionate coverage.
The matter continues before the Hobart Magistrates Court.