Share and Follow
About 170 years ago, a bundle of stone tools was deliberately buried, or “cached”, near a waterhole in far-west Queensland and never recovered. Why?
Our team’s investigation of this extremely rare site has revealed a long story of Indigenous trade and innovation in the Australian outback.
An ethnographic artifact showcases a stone tula affixed to a wooden handle using a chunk of spinifex resin. Image courtesy of Mary-Anne Stone, CC BY.
We excavated the site in 2023. A handful of stones poking out of the soil turned out to be a pile of 60 large Aboriginal stone “tulas”, deliberately cached just north of Boulia in far western Queensland.
We used scientific methods to analyse the tools, working closely with the Pitta Pitta, who hold Native Title for this place, and with approval from the station property owners.
A tula is a Wangkangurru word (from the Munga-Thirri/Simpson Desert) for a special flaked-stone tool that would be hafted onto a handle and used for woodworking. They were important tools, used across most of the continent to make objects such as boomerangs, wooden coolamon dishes, shields and clapsticks.
Explore 3D representations of some stone tulas discovered in the cache. Image courtesy of Mary-Anne Stone, CC BY.
This region’s climate is harsh. Even while we were excavating, bushfires raged to the north, preventing some of the team from joining us. Once we found the cache we knew were were in a race against time to recover the tools before they were washed away in the next flood.
Even when it doesn’t rain in the region, heavy rains in the north flow through the waterways towards Lake Eyre and slowly cover the land in a sea of brown water. After the floods, it dries again, until only the deepest pools hold any water.
The Pitta Pitta people built stone-based shelters as protection from the sun and winter winds. Innovation and connection helped them survive the region’s harsh climates. If they could not find resources locally, they bartered along vast trade routes.
Written and archaeological evidence shows traded goods included stone axes, ochre, pearl shells and more. People also traded a native tobacco called pituri – of which a couple of pounds was reportedly so valuable it could buy “two wives, husbands or many goods”.
Reports suggest that loose tulas were sometimes traded, hinting that this collection could have been a set of meticulously crafted items meant for barter.
Incredibly, this isn’t the first time such a site has been found. In 1988, the year one of us (Yinika) was born, an archaeologist excavated a bundle of stone tulas less than eight kilometres from the one we worked on.
This discovery was unique, and provided priceless scientific data. But as an isolated find, the archaeologists were unsure whether the cache was a fluke, or evidence of a cultural practice. There was nothing else quite like it – until now.
The 1988 cache was similar to this one, but also different. It held 34 tulas and 18 other stone artefacts called flakes and retouched flakes, some of which might be unfinished tulas.
The more recent cache held nothing but 60 particularly large tulas, all of which were complete. Three pairs of the tulas in this cache fit back together, showing they were made at the same time and from the same piece of stone.
It is now clear this caching practice was no fluke. Burying bundles of unused stone tulas was a repeated practice here.
Stories in the sand
Using scientific methods, we are trying to figure out when, how and possibly why these tulas were buried.
Quartz grains in the soil can be dated using a method called optically stimulated luminescence, or OSL. This technique uses decay rates in quartz to calculate when the grains were last exposed to sunlight.
Using this method meant we had to collect samples from the centre of the cache on a dark and moonless night, to avoid exposing them to any kind of light.
Dating specialist Justine Kemp then dated the samples and found a 95% probability the tulas were buried sometime between 1793 and 1913. For context, the nearby town of Boulia was established around 1879, and the Burke River police camp operated from 1878 to 1886.
The tulas may have originally been buried in a container of kangaroo skin, bark, woven strings, or even cloth if the owners overlapped with European pastoralists.
No traces were found, but this might be because organic plant and animal matter does not survive well in desert conditions. We hope to continue this line of research, to look for other microscopic traces that can tell us about the lives of these tools.
We think the Pitta Pitta ancestors were likely planning to trade the tools in these caches when the time came, but for some reason never recovered them. Perhaps this was due to disruption caused by European arrival – but the dates aren’t precise enough to be sure.
The findings reveal how planning, resource management and collective cooperation allowed Aboriginal people to not only survive, but thrive, in this land of fire and floods.
Authored by Research Fellow Yinika L. Perston, Griffith University; Lorna Bogdanek, Indigenous Knowledge Holder, Pitta Pitta Aboriginal Corporation; and Professor Lynley Wallis, Griffith University.
