Donald Trump Initiates Multi-Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against the BBC

Share and Follow

United States president Donald Trump has sued the BBC for defamation over edited clips of a speech that made it appear he directed supporters to storm the US Capitol, opening an international front in his fight against media coverage he deems untrue or unfair.

Trump accused the UK’s publicly owned broadcaster of defaming him by splicing together parts of a 6 January 2021 speech, including one section where he told supporters to march on the Capitol and another where he said “fight like hell”. It omitted a section in which he called for peaceful protest.

Former President Donald Trump has launched a legal battle against the BBC, claiming defamation and accusing the broadcaster of breaching a Florida statute that prohibits deceptive and unfair business practices. In his lawsuit, Trump is demanding a staggering $5 billion in damages for each of the two counts outlined in his complaint.

The BBC has apologised to Trump, admitted an error of judgement and acknowledged that the edit gave the mistaken impression that he had made a direct call for violent action. But it has said there is no legal basis to sue.

Trump, in his lawsuit filed on Monday (local time) in Miami federal court, said the BBC, despite its apology, “has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses”.

The BBC is funded through a mandatory licence fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught.

Trump’s legal team, in a public statement, accused the BBC of having a “long pattern of deceiving its audience” regarding coverage of Trump, suggesting that the broadcaster was motivated by a “leftist political agenda.” The lawsuit has spotlighted tensions between Trump and the media, a relationship often fraught with controversy during and after his presidency.

In a significant development related to the case, both Tim Davie, the BBC’s director-general, and Deborah Turness, head of news, have stepped down following criticism surrounding the editing of a documentary. This has intensified scrutiny on the broadcaster’s editorial practices and decision-making processes.

While the BBC has maintained a firm stance, it appears there has been no further dialogue from Trump’s legal representatives since the lawsuit was initiated. A spokesperson for the BBC conveyed to Reuters that their position remains unchanged, but when approached for additional comments post-lawsuit, the broadcaster chose not to respond immediately.

The documentary drew scrutiny after the leak of a BBC memo by an external standards adviser that raised concerns about how it was edited, part of a wider investigation of political bias at the publicly funded broadcaster.

The documentary was not broadcast in the US.

Defamation claims in the UK must be brought within a year of publication, a window that has closed for the Panorama episode.

To overcome the US Constitution’s legal protections for free speech and the press, Trump will need to prove not only that the edit was false and defamatory but also that the BBC knowingly misled viewers or acted recklessly.

The broadcaster could argue that the documentary was substantially true and its editing decisions did not create a false impression, legal experts said. It could also claim the program did not damage Trump’s reputation.

Other media have settled with Trump, including CBS and ABC when Trump sued them following his comeback win in the November 2024 election.

Trump has filed lawsuits against the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and a newspaper in Iowa, all three of which have denied wrongdoing.

The attack on the US Capitol in January 2021 was aimed at blocking Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential win over Trump in the 2020 US election.