There are a variety of concerns surrounding the current proposals, ranging from efforts to expedite approval processes and the potential erosion of environmental safeguards, to the use of ministerial discretion that could potentially undermine the reforms. Additionally, there are worries that new reporting requirements might slow down project timelines.

Here’s a closer look at the proposals on the table.

The Greens have been advocating for a complete halt to native logging, while the Labor party has pledged to the Greens that the native forestry sector will be required to comply with the forthcoming national environmental standards within the next three years.

The government plans to reevaluate its agreements with individual states, which could result in states receiving certain assessment or approval powers. Nevertheless, the minister will maintain the ultimate authority over decisions, regardless of whether a bilateral agreement is established.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who is actively involved in the committee reviewing the environmental protection legislation, believes that allowing three years for the native forestry industry to adapt is “too long.” Source: AAP / Mick Tsikas

Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young is part of the committee scrutinising the environmental protection laws, arguing three years for the native forestry industry is “too long”. Source: AAP / Mick Tsikas

Last month, Watt ruled out the Greens’ demands for a climate trigger, which would see projects rejected if they worsen carbon emissions or impact climate change.

The Coalition

The minister will have the power to set KPIs as well as sack the head of the proposed National Environment Protection Agency, addressing concerns they would have too much power.