Up next
Author
Share and Follow
FacebookXRedditPinterestWhatsApp

Key Points
  • Social media giant Meta has announced the end of its US fact-checking program.
  • The shift comes as Mark Zuckerberg tries to reconcile with Trump ahead of his inauguration.
  • Meta will also recommend more political content across its platforms.
Social media giant Meta, which owns Instagram and Facebook, has announced the end of its US fact-checking program, saying it will instead implement community notes similar to those on X (formerly Twitter).
“We’re going to get rid of fact checkers (that) have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they’ve created, especially in the US,” Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a post.
Meta also would focus its automated systems on removing “high-severity violations” and illegal content such as terrorism and illicit drugs, Zuckerberg said.

It will stop proactively scanning for hate speech and other types of rule-breaking, and review such posts only in response to user reports.

Mark Zuckerberg holding a microphone.

Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg accused fact checkers of being “politically biased”, claims fact-checking groups have strongly denied. Source: AAP, AP / David Zalubowski

The changes will affect Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the world’s biggest social media platforms, with more than three billion users globally.

Meta said it would start phasing in a ‘community notes’ system in the US over the next couple of months and improve the model over the year.
It will allow users to call out posts that are potentially misleading and need more context, rather than placing the responsibility on independent fact-checking organisations and experts.
Meta said it would not intervene in the adding of community notes to posts on its platforms.

For now, Meta is only planning the changes for the US market, with no immediate plans to end its fact-checking program in places like the European Union that take a more active approach to regulation of tech companies, a spokesperson told the Reuters news agency.

On X, users are able to add context to potentially misleading posts, and owner Elon Musk has welcomed Zuckerberg’s move to emulate the system.
“This is cool,” Musk posted on his X platform after the announcement.
Musk’s X is already under European Commission investigation over the dissemination of illegal content in the EU and the effectiveness of measures taken to combat information manipulation, including the “Community Notes” system.
Meta’s surprise announcement echoes long-standing complaints made by Trump’s Republican Party and Musk about fact checking, which many conservatives see as censorship.

They argue that fact-checking programs disproportionately target right-wing voices, which has led to proposed laws in states like Florida and Texas to limit content moderation.

A cultural tipping point

The shift comes after efforts by Zuckerberg to reconcile with Trump since his election in November, including donating one million dollars to his inauguration fund.

Trump has been a harsh critic of Meta and Zuckerberg for years, accusing the company of bias against him and threatening to retaliate against the tech billionaire once back in office.

Donald Trump standing in front of two American flags.

Donald Trump has been a harsh critic of Meta and Mark Zuckerberg for years. Source: AAP, AP / Evan Vucci

In announcing the change, Zuckerberg acknowledged the role of the recent US elections, saying they “feel like a cultural tipping point, towards once again prioritising speech”.

When Trump was asked if he believed the move was a response to his threats against Zuckerberg, he responded: “Probably, yeah.”
Trump was kicked off Facebook following the January 6 attack on the US Capitol by his supporters in 2021, though the company .
Meta has made moves in recent days that are likely to please Trump’s team, such as appointing former Republican official Joel Kaplan to head up public affairs at the company.

Zuckerberg has also named Ultimate Fighting Championship head Dana White, a close ally of Trump, to the Meta board.

In a statement, Kaplan insisted the company’s approach to content moderation had “gone too far”.

“Too much harmless content gets censored, too many people find themselves wrongly locked up in ‘Facebook jail,’” he said.

Political content to increase

As part of the overhaul, Meta said it would relocate its trust and safety teams from liberal California to more conservative Texas.
“That will help us build trust to do this work in places where there is less concern about the bias of our teams,” Zuckerberg said.
He also said that Meta would “work with President Trump to push back against foreign governments going after American companies to censor more”.

Additionally, Meta announced it would reverse its 2021 policy of reducing political content across its platforms.

Fact checkers, disinformation experts criticise plan

Aaron Sharockman, executive director of US fact-checking organization PolitiFact, rejected the contention that fact-checking was a tool to suppress free speech.

The role of US fact-checkers, he said, was to provide “additional speech and context to posts that journalists found to contain misinformation” and it was up to Meta to decide what penalties users faced.

“The great thing about free speech is that people are able to disagree about any piece of journalism we post,” Sharockman said.
“If Meta is upset it created a tool to censor, it should look in the mirror.”
PolitiFact is one of the early partners who worked with Facebook to launch the fact-checking program in the US in 2016.
The head of the International Fact Checking Network, Angie Drobnic Holan, challenged Zuckerberg’s characterisation of its members as biased or censorious.
“Fact checking journalism has never censored or removed posts; it’s added information and context to controversial claims, and it’s debunked hoax content and conspiracies.
“The fact checkers used by Meta follow a Code of Principles requiring non-partisanship and transparency,” she said in a statement.
Holan said the decision came in the wake of “external political pressure from a new administration and its supporters”, and would “hurt social media users who are looking for accurate, reliable information”.

Ross Burley, co-founder of the nonprofit Centre for Information Resilience, called the decision “a major step back for content moderation at a time when disinformation and harmful content are evolving faster than ever”.

Share and Follow
FacebookXRedditPinterestWhatsApp
You May Also Like
Broadwater Tourist Park

Severe Weather Strands Holidaymakers, Leaving Caravan Park Inaccessible

It could be days before holidaymakers are able to return to a…

Breaking: Thailand and Cambodia Declare ‘Immediate’ Ceasefire to End Tensions – What It Means for Southeast Asia

Thailand and Cambodia agreed to an “immediate” ceasefire on Saturday, the two…
St Kilda East car firebombing

Authorities Seek Public’s Help: Arson Suspect Identified in Hanukkah Car Firebombing Incident

Police have released details of a man they believe may be able…

Jet Set in 2026: The Future of International Travel Unveiled

Global travel is entering a new era, with airlines expanding their international…

Rare Wild Cat Believed Extinct Spotted Again in Thailand After Three Decades

An elusive wild cat long feared extinct in Thailand has been rediscovered…
Volodymyr Zelenskyy

Zelenskyy Set for Strategic Meeting with Trump in Florida This Sunday

Zelenskyy has announced that an upcoming discussion with another leader will focus…
Rabbi Leibel Lazaroff, 20, was shot in the abdomen and thigh while volunterring at the Chanukah by the Sea celebration at Bondi'a Archer Park on December 14.

Brave Texan Rabbi Smiles from Hospital Bed After Heroic Act in Bondi Attack

A young Texan rabbi who was critically injured in the Bondi terror…

Tragic Incident in Israel: Two Killed in Suspected Palestinian Ramming and Knife Attack

An alleged Palestinian assailant ran over a man and stabbed a woman,…