Share and Follow
The alleged gunman, aged 24, is seeking a court-issued gag order to protect the identities of his mother, brother, and sister. According to reports, these family members have received death threats following his arrest.
The tragic incident at Bondi Beach on December 14 claimed the lives of 15 individuals, including a 10-year-old girl. The shooting occurred during a Hanukkah celebration and is alleged to have been carried out by the suspect and his 50-year-old father, Sajid Akram.
During a hearing at Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court, Akram’s barrister, Richard Wilson SC, acknowledged that his client faces charges related to what is being described as the largest terror attack in Australia’s history.
“The public’s grief, outrage, and anger over the alleged actions of Akram and his father are without precedent and entirely understandable,” Wilson stated. He emphasized, “However, there is no implication that his mother, brother, or sister were involved in any way.”
“However, there is no suggestion (his) mother, brother or sister had anything to do with it.”
Angry, misguided individuals keen to be vigilantes could target Akram’s mother and siblings, Wilson said.
Some already had, he added.
The family had received death threats and had been intimidated by groups of men turning up at their home late at night, Wilson told the court.
“Are you still alive?” an unknown male asked Akram’s mother over the phone.
“We’re going to kill you,” someone else told Akram’s brother on WhatsApp.
The court was told their home had been vandalised, had pork chops thrown onto the driveway and people had driven past in utes yelling slurs and death threats.
Akram’s driver’s licence was distributed widely online minutes after the December 14 attack.
The suppression order was needed because there was a catastrophic risk that one of Akram’s family members could be killed, Wilson said.
There was also a risk of mental harm with the family living in a state of fear, he said.
While details of the family had already been published, the gag order would have a dampening effect on future threats, Wilson argued.
Akram silently watched the hearing by audiovisual link from Goulburn’s supermax prison, often bowing his head.
Several media outlets opposed the suppression application, arguing transparent reporting could be therapeutic for the community.
This was especially important due to the hostility and raw emotion felt after the massacre, the outlets’ barrister said.
“The public requires confidence to know that an (alleged) terrorist who’s affected the worst terrorist offence in Australian history is going to be held to justice,” Matthew Lewis SC told the court.
He cast the gag order as futile due to the names and address of the family having already been widely reported nationally and overseas. He also attacked evidence from Akram’s mother and brother as speculation.
He said there was no expert evidence proving the likelihood and imminence of any risk towards the 24-year-old’s family.
But the lawyer representing News Corp, Nine newspapers, the Guardian and the ABC acknowledged the Akram relatives’ plight.
“The court could have sympathy with Akram’s mother and siblings, finding they were three further people impacted by the Bondi attack,” Lewis said.
Akram has not yet been required to plead to dozens of charges, including terrorism offences and multiple counts of murder.
His father was killed by police during their alleged terror attack, which was Australia’s deadliest mass shooting since 1996’s Port Arthur massacre.
A box-like bomb was allegedly found in the boot of their car while two hand-painted ISIS flags were also in the vehicle.
The magistrate is expected to make a decision on the suppression order on April 2.