In swift action, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order over the weekend against the Trump administration and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. This came after the judge determined that James Comey’s former lawyer and confidant is “likely to succeed on the merits of his claim” concerning the government’s “unreasonable” and warrantless searches of files that had been in custody since their seizure in 2017.

On Saturday, Senior U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, based in Washington, D.C., released a four-page preliminary order favoring Daniel Richman, a legal professor and attorney. This development follows the collapse of the Department of Justice’s case against former FBI Director Comey.

As reported by Law&Crime last week, Richman requested that Kollar-Kotelly prevent the government from indefinitely searching his files. These files were confiscated in 2017 during the Arctic Haze FBI media leaks investigation, which concluded without charges against him. Despite the lack of charges, Richman argued that the Trump administration recklessly utilized these personal computer files eight years later in the ultimately dismissed case against Comey.

The case was dismissed after it was found that Bondi had “unlawfully appointed” Lindsey Halligan as the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. A U.S. magistrate judge expressed surprise at the DOJ’s “cavalier attitude towards a basic tenet of the Fourth Amendment,” as they searched Richman’s files without obtaining a new warrant, seemingly hoping to use any findings in the Comey case.

William Fitzpatrick noted that the Arctic Haze investigation concluded in September 2021 without any charges, leaving Richman’s materials untouched by the FBI until the summer of 2025. At that point, the Bureau decided to review them again without seeking a new warrant, despite the 2025 investigation targeting a different individual—Comey.

The magistrate said this while ordering the government to hand over all grand jury materials to Comey’s defense, an exceedingly rare step.

After Richman said the files contained “a significant quantum of privileged information involving multiple clients,” but also “communication with federal judges, including in connection with student applications for law clerk positions,” family medical records, and “comprehensive financial records,” Kollar-Kotelly agreed Saturday that he “made each of the necessary showings to obtain a narrow temporary restraining order” and that he is “likely to succeed” in getting his property back.

“The Court concludes that Petitioner Richman is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim that the Government has violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures by retaining a complete copy of all files on his personal computer (an ‘image’ of the computer) and searching that image without a warrant,” the judge wrote, citing the Comey case for reference. “The Court further concludes that Petitioner Richman is also likely to succeed in showing that, because of those violations, he is entitled to the return of the image.”

Daniel Richman and James Comey speak on the Hillary Clinton investigation and other topics at Columbia Law School on February 5, 2020 (Columbia Law School/YouTube).

The ruling is significant because it also puts on ice the DOJ’s ability to search the files further, notable in that it sets up a potential roadblock for any efforts to seek a new indictment against Comey.

Remarkable win for Prof Dan Richman (and Comey), at least temporarily. Judge Kollar-Kotelly orders USA not to access any info seized from Richman’s devices—which Mag Judge Fitzpatrick called the centerpiece of the case vs Comey—till she permits. https://t.co/CU7JurtXac pic.twitter.com/SL7wnOosBp

— Roger Parloff (@rparloff) December 7, 2025

The DOJ had alleged that Comey lied to Sen. Ted Cruz on Sept. 30, 2020, when he denied under questioning that he had “‘authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports’ regarding an FBI investigation concerning Person 1,” namely Hillary Clinton, because he “knew, he in fact had authorized Person 3” — that would be Richman — “to serve as an anonymous source in news reports regarding an FBI investigation concerning [Clinton].”

Kollar-Kotelly, finding that Richman “will be irreparably harmed by the ongoing violation of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures arising from the Government’s continuing retention of the image of his computer and related materials,” issued the temporary restraining order as she considers the return of the plaintiff’s files on an “expedited basis.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks about an MS-13 gang leader who was arrested in an operation by the Virginia Homeland Security Task Force, during a news conference at the Manassas FBI Field Office, Thursday, March 27, 2025, in Manassas, Va. (AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr.)

Relatedly, the DOJ, including Bondi, was ordered to “identify, segregate, and secure the image” of Richman’s computer, his “Columbia University email accounts, and his iCloud account,” and any copies. Once that happens, the judge added, the DOJ and Bondi cannot “access the covered materials” or share them “without first seeking and obtaining leave of this Court.”

The DOJ has been additionally ordered to respond by noon on Monday to confirm it is complying and to respond to Richman’s property return request by Tuesday morning.

Read the four-page order here.