Hunter Biden accuses Patrick Byrne of repetitive defamation
Share and Follow

Inset top: President Donald Trump speaks during a lunch with African leaders in the State Dining Room of the White House, Wednesday, July 9, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Evan Vucci). Inset bottom: Alex Jones testifying in Waterbury, Connecticut, on Sept. 22, 2022 (Law&Crime). Background left: Patrick Byrne, the former chief executive of Overstock.com and ally of Trump, takes a break from being questioned by the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attacks, in Washington, Friday, July 15, 2022 (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite). Background right: Hunter Biden leaves federal court, Sept. 5, 2024, in Los Angeles (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File).

The protracted legal clash between Hunter Biden, son of the former president, and Patrick Byrne, the former CEO of Overstock, is heading towards a pivotal hearing early next year that could potentially resolve the ongoing dispute. Amid this legal saga, a recent court filing seeks to shed light on crucial elements of the case for the presiding judge.

On Friday, Hunter Biden submitted a four-page supplement to his default motion, accusing Patrick Byrne of continuous defamation. In this document, Biden aims to alert the court to new public statements Byrne allegedly made, which repeat the defamatory remarks central to this lawsuit.

The filing highlights Byrne’s repeated dissemination of these alleged defamatory statements, despite a previous court ruling denying Byrne’s summary judgment request on the grounds of lacking a basis for his claims. Biden’s legal team argues that Byrne’s ongoing actions warrant the imposition of significant punitive damages, as requested in Biden’s motion for a default judgment.

These contentious remarks were reportedly made by Byrne during two December appearances on “The Alex Jones Show,” hosted by the well-known right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, and on “War Room LIVE,” an affiliated InfoWars talk show.

Byrne allegedly made the statements at issue during two December appearances on an eponymous program hosted by right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones – “The Alex Jones Show” – and one of Jones’ affiliated InfoWars talk shows, “War Room LIVE.”

The supplement takes stock of promotions for the online broadcasts.

From the filing, at length:

[A]n X account attributed to Alex Jones posted the full 14-minute clip of Defendant’s interview with the caption: “Breaking Exclusive! Hunter Biden Solicited An 800 Million Dollar Bribe From Iran In Exchange For His Father Joe Biden To Unfreeze 8 Billion Dollars In Frozen Iranian Assets, CIA Whistleblower Patrick Byrne Tells Alex Jones In This Bombshell Report. To Bolster His Claim, Byrne Has Released One Of Many Exclusive Audio Tapes In His Possession.

Biden says the X, formerly Twitter, post by Jones including the full clip has been viewed over 121,000 times as of the date of the filing.

“In the full clip posted by Alex Jones on December 9, 2025, not only does Defendant reiterate the same Defamatory Statements at issue in this matter, but he doubles-down on them by taunting Plaintiff about this lawsuit and publicly states he harbors malice toward Plaintiff,” the supplement reads.

In the underlying lawsuit, Biden claims Byrne defamed him during a June 2023 interview — and then again in October 2023.

Biden says Byrne made false claims that he and his family solicited bribes from the Islamic Republic of Iran in exchange for the Joe Biden administration releasing billions of frozen Iranian funds and for adopting a pro-Iranian position during “nuclear talks.”

Trial in the case has been serially delayed.

After originally being slated for December 2024, the trial was pushed back to this past summer – on a motion to continue filed by Byrne. Then, in July, the trial was pushed back to October – after a false start where Byrne suddenly fired his lawyers and failed to convince the judge to grant another attorney pro hac vice permission to represent him instead.

Then, the jury trial was once again pushed back — this time to January 2026. Around the same time, the court entered a default against Byrne, essentially a formality required before Biden can be awarded a default judgment.

Now, Biden says Byrne is even talking about the litigation delays in a way that makes him, the plaintiff, look responsible.

“Defendant even claims Plaintiff is scared to face him in Court about these allegations despite Plaintiff being ready to proceed to trial last July with Plaintiff present every day in the courtroom while Defendant’s misconduct in delaying the trial, failure to appear for trial, and then intentionally ignoring this Court’s orders led to default being entered against him as a sanction,” the supplement goes on.

Biden goes on to allege that Byrne violated a protective order in the case by playing a voicemail on one of the broadcasts.

“Defendant has intentionally violated the Stipulated Protective Order,” the supplement continues. “Defendant has again shown he has no intention of obeying the orders of this Court.”

To hear Biden tell it, Byrne must be punished due to such alleged repeat violations of the court’s orders and decorum.

“This republication of the defamatory statements along with a HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL recording years after the defamatory statements were first published and during the pendency of this matter demonstrates Defendant is a recidivist who will continue to maliciously attack Plaintiff with false statements,” the supplement goes on. “Nothing short of a harsh punitive damages award will be effective in curbing Defendant’s ongoing defamatory conduct against Plaintiff and outright disregard for this Court’s orders.”

And, in a footnote, Biden likens Byrne’s alleged behavior to that of President Donald Trump with regard to his repeat defamation of journalist E. Jean Carroll – violations that have resulted in tens of millions of dollars in liability in New York state courts.

Again, the filing, at length:

Considering that Defendant has continued to defame Plaintiff with the same false statements at issue in this case, this case is comparable to E. Jean Carroll’s case against President Donald Trump. In the first case, Ms. Carroll was awarded $5 million for defamation resulting from President Trump stating she lied about being sexually assaulted by him. Following that judgment, President Trump made the same defamatory statement for which he was previously found liable, and, at a second trial, Ms. Carroll was awarded additional damages, including $65 million in punitive damages alone, a 13x increase in damages from the first trial.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Authorities Allege Suspect in Antifreeze Poisoning Case Falsified Paternity Test Results

Background: The lab in Trumbull, Conn., where Kristen Hogan allegedly took her…

Georgia Mother Receives Verdict in Case of 4-Year-Old Boy’s Tragic Death Over Potty Training Issues

A Georgia woman will face a lifetime behind bars for the tragic…

New Developments Emerge Nearly Three Decades After JonBenét Ramsey Case Remains Unsolved

Colorado authorities offered their yearly update on Friday regarding the ongoing investigation…

Tragic Highway Incident: Man Charged in Fatal Attack on Pregnant Ex-Girlfriend and Unborn Child

Inset: Malik Miner (Tarrant County Jail). Background: A QuikTrip where a car…

81-Year-Old Man Arrested for Shooting Subway Owner Amid Ongoing Property Dispute

Inset: William Piar (Lake City Police Department). Background: The Subway restaurant on…

Charges Dismissed for Costco Shopper Accused of Taking Cart with Infant

Left: Michael Garrison Raine (Bonneville County Sheriff”s Office). Right: Surveillance video footage…

Tragic Incident: Man Fatally Stabbed in Dispute Over Hair Clippers

Inset: Robert Aparicio (Bexar County Sheriff”s Office). Background: The intersection where a…

Justice Served: Boyfriend Convicted in Decade-Long Amtrak Murder Case of Children’s Mother

A decade after a tragic incident aboard an Amtrak train claimed a…