Lawyer cited 'non-existent' case against Trump admin: Judge
Share and Follow

Left: U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta (via U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia). Center: Donald Trump speaks at the annual Road to Majority conference in Washington, DC, in June 2024 (Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP). Right: Attorney Sarnata Reynolds (YouTube/Skoll.org).

An attorney from Maryland has been ordered to explain why she cited a “seemingly non-existent” case during an immigration court battle with the Trump administration last month, with a federal judge calling her out this week after things ended with a dismissal.

“The court has found no such case on Westlaw or in the court”s electronic docketing system,” said U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta in a Tuesday minute order. Mehta would know: it was his own federal district — the District of Columbia — that was said to have heard the case, according to the filing in question.

“Counsel for plaintiff shall show cause by July 11, 2025, why the court should not sanction her for citing Moms Against Poverty v. Department of State,” wrote Mehta, a Barack Obama appointee.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

Attorney Sarnata Reynolds, of the Maryland-based immigrant advocacy group Ceartas Solutions, is accused of citing the “non-existent” case in a response brief filed on June 20. Reynolds was representing a foreign doctoral student at Georgetown University, identified as “Student Doe,” who sued the Trump administration after his student registration was revoked “without notice, explanation, or opportunity for Student Doe to respond,” per his complaint.

“Student Doe’s doctoral work in quantum computing addresses critical national priorities in scalable quantum systems, an area that is of strategic significance to the U.S. government and vital to maintaining competitiveness in global cybersecurity, encryption, and defense technologies,” the complaint said. “On April 10, 2025, Georgetown notified Student Doe that DHS had terminated his F-1 record in SEVIS and marked Student Doe as ‘OTHER – Individual identified in criminal records check, and/or has had their visa revoked. SEVIS record has been terminated.'”

The student’s legal team, which included lawyers from the group RFK Human Rights, claimed the revocation had “deprived him of his legal status, ability to conduct research and teach, and access to income,” along with exposing him to “immediate risk of arrest, detention, and removal — all without any legitimate legal or factual basis.”

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Woman Found Guilty of Murdering Her Husband’s Great Grandfather

Left: Britney Andrus. Right: Tyler Best (Highland County Sheriff). A Florida woman…

Man Fatally Attacks Intoxicated Roommate Over Cigarette Request: Police

Inset: William Bordsen (Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The apartments at 4600…

Husband Who Murdered Wife and Entombed Her in Concrete Receives Sentence

Top inset: Elsie Mae Wiggington (GoFundMe). Bottom inset: Frederick Lewis Wiggington (Middle…

Pathology with Dr. Priya | A Zone 7 Series | Truth in the Tissues

Welcome to Pathology with Dr. Priya | A Zone 7 Series, a…

UPDATE: Barricaded Suspect Fatally Shot by Deputy

ASO Captain Chris Sims speaks about the ongoing incident Staff report GAINESVILLE,…

Immigrants File Lawsuit Against Trump’s New ‘No-Bond’ Policy

President Donald Trump attends the 157th National Memorial Day Observance at Arlington…

Shocked Neighbor Discovers Mississippi Mother of Two Deceased in Bathroom

The Sunday evening child exchange began as usual in Jackson, Mississippi. On May…

North Carolina Man Beats Roommate to Death With Box Fan Because He Asked for Cigarettes

A North Carolina man has been charged with first degree murder after…