Appeals court disbars Trump attorney Kenneth Chesebro
Share and Follow

Inset: FILE – Kenneth Chesebro speaks to Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee during a hearing where Chesebro accepted a plea deal from the Fulton County district attorney at the Fulton County Courthouse, Oct. 20, 2023, in Atlanta (Alyssa Pointer/Pool Photo via AP). Background: President Donald Trump listens to a question from a reporter before signing an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Monday, March 31, 2025 (Pool via AP).

A federal court of appeals has suspended conservative attorney Kenneth Chesebro from practicing law in Washington, D.C.

Chesebro is widely known as one of the authors of the so-called “coup memos” – documents that offered legal opinions on how President Donald Trump could overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in a “constitutionally defensible manner.” Specifically, Chesebro was a chief architect of the alternate — or “fake” — electors plan.

On Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered “on the court”s own motion” that Chesebro “be suspended from the practice of law before this court.”

The appellate court’s terse, one-page order says its decision is premised on Chesebro’s conviction in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, in October 2023. That conviction, of course, was a direct result of Chesebro’s discredited pro-Trump legal work.

As a result of the fake electors gambit, Chesebro was charged with seven counts in the wide-ranging indictment filed by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in August 2023. Those charges included one alleged RICO violation, one count of conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer, two counts of conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree, two counts of conspiracy to commit false statements and writing, and one count of conspiracy to commit filing false documents.

On Oct. 20, 2023, days before his case was slated to go to trial, Chesebro pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit filing false documents in exchange for Willis dropping the six other counts. As part of his deal, Chesebro agreed to testify for the state against the remaining defendants and received a sentence of five years probation, 100 hours of community service and a $5,000 fine.

Then came the knock-on effects.

In February 2024, Chesebro had his law license suspended in California – in a case which is now in the final stages. Then, in March 2024, Chesebro had his law license suspended in Massachusetts. Next, in October 2024, Chesebro had his law license suspended in New York. In November 2024, Chesebro had his law license suspended in Florida – which Chesebro is contesting before the state’s supreme court. In June, Chesebro, was disbarred by a court of appeals in the Empire State “based on his conviction of a serious crime,” again referring to his Peach State legal troubles.

Indeed, the docket for the latest suspension takes note of several of those prior suspensions – all but the Bay State discipline case.

In the order, the language tracks with the New York disbarment and refers to Chesebro having “been convicted of a serious crime.”

Wednesday’s order cites “Rule III (a) of the Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit” to justify the suspension.

That rule, more or less, suggests Chesebro’s suspension has been a long time coming in the federal district.

The rule reads, in relevant part:

Upon the filing with this Court of a certified copy of a judgment of conviction demonstrating that any attorney admitted to practice before the Court has been convicted in any court of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, or of any state, territory, commonwealth or possession of the United States of a serious crime…the Clerk shall enter an order immediately suspending that attorney, regardless of the pendency of any appeal, until final disposition of a disciplinary proceeding to be commenced upon such conviction…

The appeals court also referred the disciplinary matter to its Admissions and Grievances Committee “for a recommendation to the court on the extent of the final discipline to be imposed as a result of the conduct resulting in the conviction.”

That committee will, as in several other states, be the final arbiter of Chesebro’s law license in the district.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Hotel Guest Files Lawsuit After Suffering Severe Burns in Shower Incident

Background: The Fairfield Inn & Suites San Jose Airport in San Jose,…

Ongoing Search Intensifies for Missing 9-Year-Old California Girl, Melodee Buzzard

The search intensifies for 9-year-old Melodee Buzzard, a young girl from California…

Judge Considers Sanctions Against Bondi and Noem in Abrego Garcia Case

Left to right: Kilmar Abrego Garcia attends a protest rally at the…

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Bid to Slash Sex Education Funding: What It Means for Schools

President Donald Trump speaks after signing a bill blocking California”s rule banning…

Judge Orders Trump Administration to Reinstate School Mental Health Funding

President Donald Trump during a meeting in the Oval Office of the…

Man Detained After Alleged Machete Threat at Local Business

In Gainesville, Florida, a man identified as Isidro Coste Roman, also known…

Shocking Incident: Mother Accused of Assaulting Son with Phone – Details Unveiled

Background: The apartment building on the 500 block of Northwest 7th Street…

Wisconsin Man Arrested for Allegedly Shooting Wife Multiple Times During Police Intervention

A man from Wisconsin faces charges of attempted murder following allegations that…