Mike Lindell found in contempt for discovery violations
Share and Follow

Mike Lindell listens during an interview from the podium in the press briefing room of the White House, Friday, Feb. 21, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is heading into his billion-dollar defamation trial this week with his verbal guns blazing, revealing in interviews how he’s planning to testify and “speak the truth” — saying, “I’m not going to incriminate myself! I’ve done nothing wrong.”

Lindell, 63, is being sued in federal court by Dominion Voting Systems after he “maliciously spread false claims” and accused the company of “rigging the 2020 presidential election,” according to Dominion officials. Jury selection was scheduled to kick off Monday, according to Colorado Politics, with U.S. District Judge Nina Wang — a Joe Biden appointee — overseeing the case in Denver, Colorado.

“If any attorney advised me not to testify or to take a deal, I’d tell them: ‘Never!”” Lindell told Rolling Stone last week.

“I speak the truth,” Lindell insisted. “I’ve been in many courts in my life, and ‘don’t testify’ is what they tell the guilty people, in my mind.”

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

Lindell appeared on Steve Bannon‘s “War Room” podcast on Sunday and joked about brandishing one of his famous pillows after a lawyer in the case called them “lumpy” in a past interview.

“I told my lawyers, maybe I should bring him one inside,” Lindell said.

The case made headlines in April after Wang issued a scathing rebuke of Lindell for submitting a court filing allegedly rife with errors because his attorney allegedly used a generative artificial intelligence program, citing several court cases that don’t exist.

“These defects include but are not limited to misquotes of cited cases; misrepresentations of principles of law associated with cited cases, including discussions of legal principles that simply do not appear within such decisions; misstatements regarding whether case law originated from a binding authority such as the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; misattributions of case law to this District; and most egregiously, citation of cases that do not exist,” Wang blasted.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Exclusive Sneak Peek: Oxygen’s ‘Accident, Suicide or Murder’ Returns with Thrilling Season 6 Insights

Prepare for a season filled with intrigue on Oxygen’s Accident, Suicide or…

Reagan-Appointed Judge Steps Down to Publicly Criticize Trump

Left: Donald Trump speaks at the annual Road to Majority conference in…

Letitia James Criticizes Pam Bondi’s Unconventional Time Travel Strategy

Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press…

Man Arrested After Threatening Mother and Son in Disturbing Confrontation: Police Report

Inset: Jorge Felix Larrea Diaz (Miami Dade Corrections & Rehabilitation Center). Background:…

Gorsuch and Thomas Criticize Colleagues Over Decision to Decline Pivotal Case

Left: Associate Justice Clarence Thomas sits during a group photo of the…

Police Report: 7-Month-Old Baby Found Alone in Car at Dealership

Share A tragic incident in Georgia has led to the arrest of…

Driver Acknowledges Striking Object in Incident Involving Pedestrian, Police Report Reveals

Share An unsettling incident unfolded in a St. Petersburg, Florida grocery store…

Tragic Mobile Home Arson: Man Allegedly Murders Children Before Setting Fire, Police Report

Inset: John Henry Walston Jr. (Escambia County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The mobile…