Mike Lindell found in contempt for discovery violations
Share and Follow

Mike Lindell listens during an interview from the podium in the press briefing room of the White House, Friday, Feb. 21, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is heading into his billion-dollar defamation trial this week with his verbal guns blazing, revealing in interviews how he’s planning to testify and “speak the truth” — saying, “I’m not going to incriminate myself! I’ve done nothing wrong.”

Lindell, 63, is being sued in federal court by Dominion Voting Systems after he “maliciously spread false claims” and accused the company of “rigging the 2020 presidential election,” according to Dominion officials. Jury selection was scheduled to kick off Monday, according to Colorado Politics, with U.S. District Judge Nina Wang — a Joe Biden appointee — overseeing the case in Denver, Colorado.

“If any attorney advised me not to testify or to take a deal, I’d tell them: ‘Never!”” Lindell told Rolling Stone last week.

“I speak the truth,” Lindell insisted. “I’ve been in many courts in my life, and ‘don’t testify’ is what they tell the guilty people, in my mind.”

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

Lindell appeared on Steve Bannon‘s “War Room” podcast on Sunday and joked about brandishing one of his famous pillows after a lawyer in the case called them “lumpy” in a past interview.

“I told my lawyers, maybe I should bring him one inside,” Lindell said.

The case made headlines in April after Wang issued a scathing rebuke of Lindell for submitting a court filing allegedly rife with errors because his attorney allegedly used a generative artificial intelligence program, citing several court cases that don’t exist.

“These defects include but are not limited to misquotes of cited cases; misrepresentations of principles of law associated with cited cases, including discussions of legal principles that simply do not appear within such decisions; misstatements regarding whether case law originated from a binding authority such as the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; misattributions of case law to this District; and most egregiously, citation of cases that do not exist,” Wang blasted.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Nevada Supreme Court Allows Legal Proceedings Against Alleged ‘Fake Electors’ to Move Forward

Left: Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford (Nevada Attorney General”s Office). Right: Chairman…

Shocking Highway Rage: Driver’s Reckless Overtake Leads to Tragic Shooting Incident

A man from Colorado is currently facing serious charges after a road…

Son Convicted in Gruesome Murder of Adoptive Parents: Dima Tower Trial Verdict

In a recent courtroom drama in Florida, a jury delivered a guilty…

Shocking Assault: Woman and Minor Strike Victim with ‘Whip-Like Object’ – Police Report Reveals

Share A child abuse probe in upstate New York has led to…

Authorities Report Suspect Sought Gas Money Prior to Alleged Shooting

Inset (from left to right): Elian Araujo, Hugo Carlin, and Misael Jiminez…

Tragic Loss: Drunk Driver Claims Lives of 5-Year-Old Louisiana Boy and Grandmother at School Bus Stop

A tragic incident in Louisiana has led to the arrest of a…

Police Report: Man Allegedly Responsible for Girlfriend’s Tragic Death

Background: The Allen County Jail in Fort Wayne, Indiana (Google Maps). Inset…

Georgia Mom Charged After Infant Tragically Dies in Overheated Car

A tragic incident in Georgia has led to criminal charges against a…