Trump DOJ probing Tina Peters case for 'abuses' of justice
Share and Follow

Left: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the East Room at the White House Thursday, Feb. 27, 2025, in Washington (Carl Court/Pool Photo via AP). Right: Former Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters looks on during sentencing for her election interference case at the Mesa County District Court Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024, in Grand Junction, Colo. (Larry Robinson/The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel via AP).

President Donald Trump’s Justice Department is probing the state conviction of Tina Peters — the first election official found guilty of a felony over 2020 election conspiracy theories — to see if there were “abuses of the criminal justice process” and a legal bias “toward inflicting political pain,” the DOJ says.

Peters, 69, was convicted last August on seven counts of engaging in a security breach related to unauthorized access to voting machines while she worked as a county clerk in Mesa County, Colorado. In October — after a marathon hearing in which Peters repeatedly expressed defiance and stuck to her theories — Peters was sentenced to nine years in state prison for her felony offenses.

“I am convinced you would do it all over again if you could,” U.S. District Judge Matthew Barrett told Peters at her sentencing.

“You’re as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen,” Barrett blasted. “You are no hero. You abused your position and you’re a charlatan.”

More from Law&Crime: ‘Rogue use of executive authority’: Trump DOJ rips judge for deeming Biden watchdog firing ‘illegal’ and pressures DC Circuit to respond before SCOTUS showdown

On Monday, DOJ lawyers filed a “Statement of Interest” in the District of Colorado announcing its review of Peters’ case — saying “reasonable concerns” have been raised recently regarding her conviction and incarceration.

“These concerns relate to, among other things, the exceptionally lengthy sentence imposed relative to the conduct at issue, the First Amendment implications of the trial court’s October 2024 assertions relating to Ms. Peters, and whether Colorado’s denial of bail pending appeal was arbitrary or unreasonable under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments such that relief is appropriate,” the filing said.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

High School Kitchen Manager Arrested on Serious Charges of Incest and Child Sexual Assault

In a deeply unsettling development, a Colorado high school kitchen employee has…

Tragic Discovery: Missing 4-Year-Old Boy Found Deceased Two Miles from Father’s Residence

Authorities confirmed on Friday that they have discovered the body of a…

Tragic Incident: Home Daycare Provider Allegedly Injures Infant Over Personal Distress

Background: The home in Little Rock, Ark., where Erin Sauls ran a…

Unresolved Mystery: The Lonnie Rogers Cold Case and the 44-Year Pursuit for Answers

In the harsh winter of January 1981, Lonene “Lonnie” Rogers vanished from…

Chaos at Police Station: Mother of Three Arrested for Menacing, Intoxicated Father Arrives to Collect Children

The Solon Police Department in Solon, Ohio (Google Maps). In Ohio, a…

Husband Faces Charges After Confronting Wife’s New Partner in Dramatic Encounter

Share A man from Pennsylvania has confessed to police that he shot…

Intoxicated Driver Collides with Tesla, Resulting in Tragic Loss of Her Son; Children Were Passengers

Background: The scene of the crash at North Fessenden Street and North…

AGT Violinist Files Lawsuit Against Will Smith Alleging Sexual Harassment

Renowned actor Will Smith has been embroiled in allegations of sexual harassment,…