What JD Vance said about James Comey's criminal case
Share and Follow

Left: Former FBI Director James Comey reacts to indictment by claiming his innocence (James Comey/Bluesky). Right: Vice President JD Vance appears on NBC”s Meet the Press on Sunday, Oct. 12, 2025 (Meet the Press/X).

On the same day that a former Donald Trump attorney turned rookie top prosecutor insisted on a sweeping protective order to ensure a “fair trial with impartial jurors,” Vice President JD Vance went on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday and stated, as fact, that former FBI Director James Comey “obviously lied under oath.”

Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, aided by North Carolina-based federal prosecutors Tyler Lemons and Gabriel Diaz, filed documents Sunday in support of a protective order, claiming the high-profile nature of the case and Comey’s remarks on social media defending his “innocence” made “restricting the use and dissemination of […] discovery” necessary, since both Comey and the prosecution “have an interest in a fair trial with impartial jurors[.]”

Enter Vance, who holds a Yale Law School degree, telling NBC’s Kristen Welker on Sunday morning that Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James “obviously” committed crimes, and that the proof the Trump administration is following the “facts and the law,” rather than the president’s directives, is that former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aren’t facing charges.

“President Trump’s social media last month, calling for his Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute his political opponents James Comey, Letitia James and Adam Schiff, was actually meant to be a private message. Both Comey and James have now been indicted. Is the Department of Justice acting on orders from the president to prosecute his political opponents?” Welker asked.

“No, we’re driven by the law and the facts of the case,” Vance replied, claiming a “far-left” grand jury in a “far-left area” of Virginia indicted both Comey and James. “If you look at the fact that James Comey obviously lied under oath, Letitia James obviously committed mortgage fraud, what we’re doing is letting the law drive the prosecution decisions in the Department of Justice.”

“You know who we haven’t prosecuted? Joe Biden or Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. Unlike Biden’s Department of Justice, Kristen, which actually went after Donald Trump in the midst of an election, we are not doing that. We are letting the law drive these decisions, that’s exactly as it should be,” Vance continued.

The vice president then dismissed concerns about Trump’s role in the prosecutions, saying he’s “allowed to have opinions about the law enforcement of the federal government.”

“Did somebody break the law? If so, we’re going to prosecute them,” Vance articulated the administration’s claimed stance.

Contrast this with Vance separately telling George Stephanopoulos of ABC’s “This Week” that there’s nothing more to see regarding Trump administration “border czar” Tom Homan’s alleged acceptance of a $50,000 cash bribe, as Director Kash Patel’s FBI wouldn’t move forward with an investigation.

“Accepting $50,000 for doing what, George? I am not even sure I understand the question,” Vance said. “Is it illegal to take a payment for doing services? The FBI has not prosecuted him.”

In a Monday filing for U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff’s review, Comey’s legal team has pushed back on the government’s proposal that the protective order be applied to “almost all of discovery,” rather than being “selectively designate[d].”

The defense further cast it as absurd that the former FBI director, also a licensed attorney, former high-ranking DOJ official and federal prosecutor, cannot now be “entrusted with some of the most sensitive and highly guarded information in the country” as he fights false statement and obstruction charges.

“To assert now, that he cannot be trusted with receiving discovery in his case controverts his long career of distinguished government service at the highest levels. Moreover, no one knows the facts of this case better than Mr. Comey himself,” the filing continued. “It places his defense at a severe and unnecessary disadvantage to insist that he be prohibited from possessing Protected Material to be able to review and refer to whenever necessary throughout preparation of his defense.”

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Suspect Requests Reduced Bail Due to Impending Fatherhood, Authorities Report

Background: The Youngstown Municipal Courthouse in Youngstown, Ohio (Google Maps). Inset: James…

Woman Impersonating Missing Madeleine McCann Convicted of Harassing Child’s Family

A Polish woman who made headlines by asserting she was the missing…

Jackson Criticizes Supreme Court Justices for Ruling Against Transgender Rights Stay

Left: MIAMI, FL-MARCH 10: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is…

Uncovering the Infamous Legacy of Aileen Wuornos: The ‘Damsel of Death’ Who Challenged Stereotypes of Serial Killers

Once known as Florida’s “Damsel of Death,” Aileen Wuornos stands among America’s…

Tragic Family Incident: Daughter Admits to Parents’ Shooting in Disturbing Confession

Inset left: Mia Bailey (Washington County Sheriff’s Office). Inset middle: Joseph Bailey…

Probation Violator Arrested for Allegedly Threatening Pregnant Woman’s Life

Staff Report GAINESVILLE, Fla. — A troubling incident unfolded yesterday as Zion…

Shocking Abuse Case: Five Arrested for Allegedly Chaining Woman in Yard for Months Over Personal Grudge

In Austin, Texas, a woman was reportedly held captive, mistreated, and deprived…

Chilling Crime: Teen Father Tragically Ends Newborn’s Life in Shocking Act

News footage of Logan Kruckenberg Anderson in court on Nov. 5 (WMTV).…