Sanda, sentenced to death in 2020, was among 175 inmates granted release under the President’s exercise of mercy. This decision has sparked significant controversy and discussion across the nation.

Dr. Bello Mohammed, speaking on behalf of the family, released a statement on Monday expressing that the pardon has painfully reopened old wounds and revived memories of the tragic event that shook the nation eight years prior.

‘Worst possible injustice,’ says victim’s relatives

The family described the clemency as “the worst possible injustice any family could experience,” lamenting that it undermines years of judicial processes that confirmed Sanda’s guilt at every level of appeal.

They stressed that the convicted woman had shown no remorse throughout the trial and incarceration, adding that her release “trivialises a cold-blooded murder” and disrespects the memory of their late son.

The family recalled that both the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court upheld the death sentence, offering some closure before the recent pardon nullified their hope for lasting justice.

Tinubu’s decision raises questions on fairness

The statement further accused the Federal Government of prioritising the feelings of Sanda’s relatives over the pain of the victim’s family and disregarding the sanctity of judicial rulings.

They argued that the President’s mercy gesture was politically and emotionally motivated rather than guided by justice, warning that such actions could set a dangerous precedent for serious crimes.

Despite their disappointment, the family said they would leave the matter to God, describing Him as the “ultimate judge” who would deliver true justice on the day of recompense.