Appeals court rules against Trump in birthright citizenship battle
Share and Follow


(The Hill) — A federal appeals court ruled against President Trump on Friday, barring the administration from ending birthright citizenship.

The three-judge panel on the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district court injunction that barred the administration from enacting a January executive order, signed by the president, that would curtail birthright citizenship. 

“The ‘lessons of history’ thus give us every reason to be wary of now blessing this most recent effort to break with our established tradition of recognizing birthright citizenship and to make citizenship depend on the actions of one’s parents rather than — in all but the rarest of circumstances — the simple fact of being born in the United States,” the court wrote in the 100-page ruling.

The federal appeals court in Boston became the latest court to say that the president’s push to end birthright citizenship, which states that anyone born in the U.S. are citizens regardless of their parents’ immigration status, is likely unlawful. 

“Our nation’s history of efforts to restrict birthright citizenship — from Dred Scott in the decade before the Civil War to the attempted justification for the enforcement of the Chinese Exclusion Act in Wong Kim Ark — has not been a proud one,” the court’s top judge wrote in the ruling. 

The latest appeals court decision marks the fifth federal court since June to either issue or uphold orders blocking Trump’s order, just one part of his robust immigration agenda since returning to the Oval Office.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta welcomed the ruling in a post online.

“Today’s decision upholds a nationwide injunction in our lawsuit challenging the President’s attempt to end, with the stroke of a pen, the constitutional right to birthright citizenship,’ Bonta wrote Friday on social platform X.

He added, “We will continue to oppose this executive order until the President’s attempt to unmake the Constitution is blocked completely.”

The Golden State was among the 20 states included in the lawsuit.

Late last month, the Department of Justice asked the Supreme Court to review whether Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship is constitutional. 

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Tri-Cities Residents Track Santa’s Journey with Hawkins Co. Emergency Communications’ Operation Santa Claus

In Hawkins County, Tennessee, the Emergency Communications team is on duty year-round,…

Revitalizing History: Augusta’s Iconic Sibley Mill Acquired for $2 Million Renovation

AUGUSTA, Ga – A transformative chapter is set to unfold for a…

Senator Murkowski Criticizes DOJ’s Limited Release of Epstein Files: What You Need to Know

Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska has expressed her dissatisfaction with the Department…

Historic $1.7 Billion Powerball Jackpot: Check Your Winning Numbers Now!

Excitement is in the air as the latest numbers for the staggering…

Georgia Power Expansion Plan Endorsed by Public Service Commission: Implications for Ratepayers Unveiled

COLUMBUS, Ga. (WRBL) — In a move to bolster the state’s energy…

Survey Reveals Growing Economic Pessimism Among Adults Amid Uncertain Financial Outlook

According to a recent poll, economic confidence has taken a hit, reaching…

Florida House Party Ends in Tragedy: 19-Year-Old Detained After Five Injured

On December 20th, a routine evening in Jacksonville’s Arlington neighborhood took a…

Discover Which Major Retailers and Restaurants Are Closing Doors by 2026

(NEXSTAR) – The year 2025 marked another challenging period for traditional retail…