Share and Follow
In a decisive move on Monday night, the Beaufort County Council chose to return a proposed gunfire ordinance to the Community Services and Public Safety committee for further evaluation. This unanimous decision followed an earlier postponement of the second reading, a strategic delay meant to facilitate discussions with both local and state law enforcement representatives.
County officials expressed their desire for a more comprehensive dialogue on the ordinance’s language and the practicalities of its enforcement. The council’s aim is to ensure the new regulations are both effective and enforceable, reflecting the input gathered from these critical conversations.
Initially, the ordinance had successfully navigated through the Community Services and Public Safety committee, receiving approval in its first reading by the county council. It seeks to curb the discharge of firearms within 500 feet of structures, parks, or playgrounds in certain unincorporated areas. This measure was primarily motivated by community complaints about reckless gunfire and subsequent property damage caused by stray bullets.
During the recent meeting with law enforcement officials, council members and administration hinted at a probable shift in the ordinance’s classification—from criminal to civil—indicating a potential change in how violations might be addressed. This pivot could signify a more flexible approach to maintaining public safety while considering the practical aspects of ordinance enforcement.
According to council members and administration that attended the meeting with law enforcement officials, amending the ordinance from criminal to civil is likely.
“My biggest takeaway is that we send it back to committee to work on it further. I agree, and the sheriff and solicitor both agree that potentially taking away the criminal side of it would make it easier for prosecution in magistrate court,” said Councilman David Bartholomew.
The committee could also weigh changing the ordinance to fit more into a nuisance or peace disturbance type of ordinance. What needs to be solved, according to county officials, is what type of penalties would be brought to individuals violating the ordinance.
“I think we’re getting closer, but it needs to be civil penalties not criminal,” said Councilwoman Anna Maria Tabernik. “I believe there’s more to be done.”
The Community Services and Public Safety committee meets on the first Monday of April.