Supreme Court blocks order requiring Trump administration to reinstate thousands of federal workers
Share and Follow


Video above: Supreme Court allows Alien Enemies Act deportations to continue

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked an order for the Trump administration to return to work thousands of federal employees who were let go in mass firings aimed at dramatically downsizing the federal government.

The justices acted in the administration’s emergency appeal of a ruling by a federal judge in California ordering that 16,000 probationary employees be reinstated while a lawsuit plays out because their firings didn’t follow federal law.

The effect of the high court’s order will keep employees in six federal agencies on paid administrative leave for now. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson said they would have kept the judge’s order in place.

A second lawsuit, filed in Maryland, also resulted in an order blocking the firings at those same six agencies, plus roughly a dozen more. But that order only applies in the 19 states and the District of Columbia that sued the administration.

The Justice Department is separately appealing the Maryland order.

At least 24,000 probationary employees have been terminated since Trump took office, the lawsuits claim, though the government has not confirmed that number.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco ruled that the terminations were improperly directed by the Office of Personnel Management and its acting director. He ordered rehiring at the departments of Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Defense, Energy, the Interior and the Treasury.

His order came in a lawsuit filed by a coalition of labor unions and nonprofit organizations that argued they’d be affected by the reduced manpower.

Alsup, who was nominated by Democratic President Bill Clinton, expressed frustration with what he called the government’s attempt to sidestep laws and regulations by firing probationary workers with fewer legal protections.

He said he was appalled that employees were told they were being fired for poor performance despite receiving glowing evaluations just months earlier.

The administration has insisted that the agencies themselves directed the firings and they “have since decided to stand by those terminations,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the court.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

New York City Nurses to Reopen Negotiations with Hospitals on Fourth Day of Strike

NEW YORK – In a significant labor movement, New York City’s nurses,…

Trump’s Influence Sways Two Republicans to Defeat War Powers Resolution Amid Intense Pressure

On Wednesday, Senate Republicans successfully blocked a resolution aimed at restricting President…

Corvette Discovered Submerged in Orange County Pond by Firefighters

ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. – A peculiar scene unfolded in Orange County on…

Former Miss Universe Alleges She Awarded Trump Her Nobel Peace Prize in Surprising Encounter

On Thursday, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado revealed that she had…

Exciting Kickoff: Competitors Neck and Neck in Latin America Amateur Golf Championship Opening Round

LIMA, Peru – In an impressive opening round at the 2026 Latin…

Shocking Twist in Charlie Kirk Case: Defendant Demands Prosecutor Disqualification

SALT LAKE CITY – A pivotal court appearance is scheduled for Friday…

South Korean Court Hands Yoon a 5-Year Prison Term Over Martial Law Charges

SEOUL – In a landmark decision, a South Korean court sentenced former…

Ex-New College Administrator Accepts Plea Deal in Public Indecency Case

SARASOTA, Fla. (WFLA) — A former official from New College of Florida,…