Brace for a Cold Snap: Windy Conditions and Freezing Temps Hit Hard Tonight!

SAVANNAH, Ga. () – Brace for a significant drop in temperatures today, accompanied by persistent gusty winds. The day begins with morning highs in...
HomeLocal NewsUnveiling the Crown: The Most Shocking British Royal Scandals from Abdication to...

Unveiling the Crown: The Most Shocking British Royal Scandals from Abdication to Harry and Andrew

Share and Follow


LONDON – The British monarchy, a symbol of tradition and continuity, remains acutely sensitive to the pulse of public opinion. This sensitivity has been on full display amid the recent scandal surrounding Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, who found himself embroiled in legal troubles once again.

Mountbatten Windsor was detained for nearly 11 hours on Thursday under suspicion of misconduct in public office. Authorities are probing whether he disclosed confidential trade information to the late Jeffrey Epstein during his tenure as a U.K. trade envoy. It is important to note that this arrest is separate from the notorious sexual trafficking allegations associated with Epstein.

Throughout his controversial association with Epstein, Mountbatten Windsor has consistently maintained his innocence. However, he has yet to publicly address these latest accusations, which have come to light following the release of extensive files by the U.S. Justice Department concerning Epstein’s dealings.

For King Charles III, this ongoing saga involving his younger brother presents a significant distraction, casting a shadow over his reign, now entering its fourth year. As the monarchy navigates these turbulent waters, the fallout from such scandals continues to test its resilience and adaptability.

For King Charles III, his younger brother’s travails have overshadowed almost everything during his reign, now in its fourth year.

The king, who is also contending with an unspecified form of cancer, has to ensure that it is business as usual. The institution requires nothing less.

But the continuing investigations into Mountbatten-Windsor, the image of him slouched in the back of his chauffeur-driven car, seemingly shocked and confused, will not be easy to dislodge.

The king is doing his best to insulate the monarchy from any further scandals relating to Andrew and his connections with Epstein, who took his own life in a New York jail in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges.

He has stripped Andrew of all his titles and honors and banished him from his mansion near Windsor Castle. Now, the king says, the law “must take its course.’’

Where that course leads, nobody knows. For the British monarchy, it’s potentially a crisis as grave as any it has experienced since its current iteration — the House of Windsor — was born more than a century ago.

World War I

The House of Windsor was born out of conflict.

The royal families of Europe are intertwined, and Britain’s is heavily German, especially after Queen Victoria married Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, with whom she had nine children.

When Britain and Germany went to war in 1914, some members of the wider British royal family found themselves on opposing sides.

Britain’s King George V changed the family name from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor in 1917, and initiated legislation to strike out the titles of princes and lords who had backed the Germans.

One target was Prince Ernest Augustus, Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale, who was a U.K. royal and also a prince of Hanover. His title was removed for being an enemy of Britain under the 1917 act, which was enacted in 1919, once the war was over.

According to the House of Commons Library, “this was the first and only time such a title has been removed in this way.”

Mountbatten-Windsor is no longer a prince or Duke of York, but remains eighth in line to the throne. The current British government said Friday it is considering introducing legislation to remove Andrew from the line of succession to the crown.

The abdication

The relationship between Edward, Prince of Wales, and U.S. socialite Wallis Simpson was a headache that turned into a constitutional crisis. Simpson was twice divorced, and Edward, the heir to the throne, was destined to be ceremonial head of the Church of England, which did not allow divorced people to remarry in church.

The prince became King Edward VIII when his father King George V died in early 1936. He continued to say he wanted to marry Simpson, despite the opposition of the British government.

Forced to choose between duty and passion, he gave up the throne in December 1936, announcing in a radio broadcast that “I have found it impossible … to discharge my duties as king as I would wish to do without the help and support of the woman I love.”

The news was a surprise to many in Britain, though not beyond it. British newspapers had not reported on the relationship, and American magazines had offending articles cut out before going on sale.

The abdication set the monarchy on a new course. Edward’s younger brother took the throne as King George VI. He was succeeded by his daughter, Queen Elizabeth II, and after her 70-year reign by her son, King Charles III. All doubled down on the idea that the monarch’s primary attribute should be a sense of duty — something Edward, in the popular imagination, lacked.

Edward and Wallis, thereafter the Duke and Duchess of Windsor and suspected by some of Nazi sympathies, were sent to the Bahamas, where he served as governor. After the war they mostly stayed away from Britain, living a life of nomadic luxury.

Princess Diana’s death

The death of Princess Diana — the ex-wife of Charles — in a car crash in Paris in 1997, at the age of 36, shocked the world and left her family, including sons William and Harry, then 15 and 12, in mourning.

The strength of public feeling caught the royal family by surprise. Mounds of floral tributes piled up outside the gates of Buckingham Palace and Diana’s home at Kensington Palace to mourn a princess who had been ostracized by the royal family after her divorce from Charles in 1992.

The queen was at Balmoral in Scotland on her summer holiday with her husband Prince Philip, Charles, William and Harry. The family kept their grief private and stuck to routine — taking the ashen-faced boys to church on Sunday morning — and the queen did not issue a statement for several days.

She was advised to make a public display of grief by Prime Minister Tony Blair, who perfectly caught the public mood with his own tribute calling Diana “the people’s princess.”

After newspaper headlines urging “Speak to us Ma’am,” and “Show us you care,” the queen made a live televised address to the nation on the eve of Diana’s funeral.

“What I say to you now, as your queen and as a grandmother, I say from my heart,” the queen said, acknowledging the country’s grief, praising Diana and promising to cherish her memory.

The trouble with Harry

Not long ago, Andrew had been trying to regain favor with the family, benefiting indirectly from the trouble with Prince Harry.

Harry became estranged from his father and older brother, Prince William, heir to the throne, when he and his wife, Meghan, stepped down from their working roles and moved to California in 2020. The couple famously aired their grievances with the royal family in a tell-all interview to Oprah Winfrey and a revealing Netflix series. Harry then fueled the tensions by revealing personal conversations in his memoir, “Spare.”

Harry also broke from royal protocol in turning to the courts to sort out his legal problems. He became the first senior royal to testify in court in more than a century in his successful phone hacking lawsuit against the Daily Mirror.

A failed legal effort to restore his police protection detail that was stripped from him when he left royal work, though, was seen as an attack on his father’s government.

When the courts finally rejected the lawsuit, it provided a chance for a reunion between father and son. The two shared a cup of tea at Charles’ London abode, Clarence House, in September 2024. It was their first meeting in over a year.

It lasted less than an hour.

____

Associated Press writers Jill Lawless and Brian Melley contributed to this report.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Share and Follow