Gisele Bündchen Makes Cameo at 2026 Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show

Gisele Bündchen delighted fans on Sunday with a surprise appearance at the 2026 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show. The 46-year-old Brazilian supermodel opened the show in...
HomeMoviesClayface Explained: DC’s Shape-Shifting Villain’s Most Confusing Moments and Storylines

Clayface Explained: DC’s Shape-Shifting Villain’s Most Confusing Moments and Storylines

Contains spoilers for “Clayface”

Batman films have repeatedly returned to the same familiar enemies. The Joker, Catwoman, Riddler and Bane have all appeared on screen more than once. They remain compelling characters, but Batman’s rogues’ gallery is deep enough to keep introducing fresh threats. Clayface, one of the most tragic figures in Batman’s world, has long been overdue for the spotlight.

For many fans, the definitive Clayface story is the “Feat of Clay” two-parter from Batman: The Animated Series. In that version, an accident destroys an actor’s appearance, prompting him to seek an experimental treatment that restores his beauty at a terrible cost. The live-action Clayface movie adapts that basic premise through Matt Hagen (Tom Rhys Harries), whose treatment produces increasingly disturbing side effects and gives him the ability to assume almost any form.

Early reviews of Clayface praised it as an effective horror film that draws selectively from Batman’s mythology. Yet a strong movie can still leave viewers with unanswered questions once the credits roll. From Matt’s strange powers to the film’s ambiguous timeline, these are some of Clayface’s most confusing moments, along with possible explanations where the movie leaves room for them.

Why would Matt Hagen sleep with Markos Szabo’s girl?

The story begins with Matt Hagen at the height of his career. After earning a best actor nomination, he travels to Gotham with his friend Corey Bowery (Joshua James) to celebrate. At a nightclub, Matt sleeps with Mia Torrez (Joana Ribeiro), who is also dating mobster Markos Szabo (David Dencik). When Markos learns about the affair, he brutally carves up Matt’s face. That naturally raises one question: Why would Matt risk sleeping with a gangster’s girlfriend in Gotham?

Honestly, sleeping with a mobster’s partner is a bad idea in any city. But Matt was raised in Gotham, a place where organized crime is hardly a secret. Markos may control his own operation, yet the city is also associated with the Falcone, Maroni and Sionis crime families. Anyone familiar with Gotham should understand exactly how dangerous it is to cross people like them.

Matt’s decision looks even more reckless because Corey explicitly warns him that Mia is involved with Markos. The most plausible explanation is simple arrogance. Actors can be surrounded by admiration and attention, and Matt has just received a career-changing nomination. At that point, he may genuinely believe that his success makes him untouchable. Unfortunately, that confidence proves to be his undoing.

How does Matt’s clay work?

After Markos disfigures him, Matt turns to Dr. Caitlyn Corr (Naomi Ackie). Conventional plastic surgery cannot repair the damage, so Corr uses nanobots to reconstruct his face. Matt eventually discovers that the technology has another effect: With enough nanobots in his body, he can reshape his appearance at will. He can imitate other people and even form spikes from his arm. The film, however, never fully explains the mechanics behind these abilities.

At certain points, Matt’s face changes instantly, as though someone has switched him from one identity to another. In other scenes, his body behaves more like soft clay. During the climactic confrontation at the Vesuvius Club, a punch sinks into his face and is absorbed with the pliability of Play-Doh. The inconsistent rules make it difficult to determine whether the nanobots are always functioning in the same way.

One possibility is that the instantaneous transformations are primarily a visual choice designed to make Matt’s powers feel unsettling. His face may technically be changing more gradually, while the audience sees the result immediately for dramatic effect. Another interpretation is that the nanobots evolve throughout the movie. They may operate with greater precision at first, then become increasingly unstable as Matt’s mental state deteriorates. By the end of Clayface, that loss of control could explain why he appears more like a living clay monster than a man with advanced facial reconstruction.

Why would John threaten Markos?

Call us cautious if you like, but we still cannot understand why so many people in Clayface keep provoking a violent mobster known for carving up his enemies’ faces.

After Corey is found dead in his trailer, John (Max Minghella), Dr. Corr’s fiancé, examines the crime scene. He later confronts Markos and makes it clear that he plans to put him behind bars. The problem is that John does not appear to have concrete evidence linking Markos to Corey’s murder. That is especially reckless given that Markos’ lawyer, Frank (Eddie Marsan), has already turned up dead.

As with Matt’s decision to pursue Mia, John’s behavior may be driven by overconfidence. Earlier in the film, he makes clear that he is fed up with Gotham’s corrupt police department, where officers routinely look the other way to protect Markos. John may simply have reached the point where he no longer cares about provoking the gangster. Still, he should remember that he has a fiancée at home—and Markos is clearly willing to target her.

When is Clayface set?

In the new DC Universe, Clayface is chronologically the third movie, following Superman and Supergirl. Despite that placement, the film largely stands on its own. That has left many viewers wondering when, exactly, its events take place.

The uncertainty appears to be deliberate. Speaking with Tech Radar, director James Watkins avoided offering a definitive answer, describing the setting as “a kind of a world which is… it’s modern, but it also has a sort of analog feel and a retro-art school feel to the world.” The movie’s computers look contemporary, but smartphones are notably absent. At minimum, the technology suggests that the story unfolds sometime in the 21st century.

DC Studios co-head Peter Safran has confirmed that Clayface takes place before Creature Commandos, and that the Clayface seen in the animated series is the same character introduced in the film. That means Matt has already been active for some time by the events of Superman. It is also unclear how long it took him to restore his body after Caitlyn tased him and disrupted the nanobots coursing through him.

Was that Aaron Paul?

Clayface may feature one of the strangest celebrity cameos of 2026. During the battle at the Vesuvius Club, Matt tries to enter Markos’ heavily guarded sanctuary. He cycles through several appearances to confuse the mobster’s men and reach the back room. For roughly one second, he assumes the form of Aaron Paul. The moment passes almost immediately, but its lack of context makes it particularly baffling.

The joke could be that Matt spent his period of self-imposed isolation watching Breaking Bad nonstop. There may, however, be a production-related explanation. Before the movie premiered, reports claimed that Paul had a small role in Clayface. A brief appearance would make sense, but having Matt randomly transform into the actor for a moment is far stranger.

The likeliest possibility is that Aaron Paul’s role was originally larger before scenes were removed during editing. IMDb credits Seth Isaac Thomas as young Matt Hagen, yet the finished film contains no flashbacks showing Matt as a child. It also includes references to Matt’s father being a notorious figure in Gotham’s criminal underworld. One theory is that Paul was meant to play Hagen’s father in a flashback, after which Matt would later imitate him to frighten a Markos associate with a personal history involving the man.

With those scenes absent, the Aaron Paul moment is left hanging without any explanation. It now plays like an especially strange visual gag, although deleted scenes on a future Blu-ray release could reveal the original purpose of the cameo.

Why doesn’t Matt’s body always return to him?

When Matt first recognizes the nanobots have given him incredible powers, he accidentally cuts himself to see the blood return to his body. Later in Dr. Corr’s lab, he slices off a chunk of skin that also reattaches to his body. This appears to be an almost instantaneous reaction to where if any part of his body becomes unattached, it’ll find its way back to him. 

This adds a confusing layer to Matt’s killing streak in the finale. In the Vesuvius’ back room, Matt kills Mia after she bites his arm. The clay from his body latches into her mouth and nostrils, suffocating her. Shortly thereafter, Matt pins Markos to the ground and slices up his face to let blood run all over Markos. The blood seeps behind Markos’ own eyes and then returns to Matt’s body, effectively ripping Markos’ face completely off from underneath the skin.

By this point, Matt’s had his powers for a while. It’s possible he’s learned to better control the nanobots to where they can return to him if he wants them to but can also leave them behind if he’d prefer. The chunk of clay in Mia’s mouth theoretically should’ve just returned to Matt, maybe even ripping her jaw out in the process for an even more grotesque death. It’s still a very effective kill, suggesting there’s more to Clayface’s powers than meets the eye. 

Does Matt still exist?

“Clayface” ends with Matt killing John and confronting Caitlyn, insisting he loves and wants to be with her. However, Matt is losing control over the nanobots. To get him away from her, Caitlyn electrocutes him, which makes the nanobots malfunction. Earlier, Caitlyn points out how she has a kill switch that can deactivate the nanobots if they ever go out of control. As Matt loses control over his body, she presses the switch. 

This should’ve destroyed all the nanobots, but as we see in the final scene, Matt’s still out there. The question becomes: Is that really Matt underneath all the clay, or have the nanobots effectively taken him over? We know there’s at least a semblance of Matt’s psyche within this monster. 

When Matt’s body begins morphing, Caitlyn struggles with whether or not to activate the kill switch, but Matt begs her to do it. This suggests Matt’s mind is still there within all of the chaos and was able to break through for a moment. 

After Caitlyn kills the nanobots, Matt dissolves into a puddle and flows into the sewer. What happened when Matt later reconstituted himself? Was his mind still in control, or is there something more sinister running things now? There’s the potential for Clayface to become a fascinating villain who is constantly at war with himself later in the DCU’s run. 

How does Clayface turn into the version we see in Creature Commandos?

As mentioned earlier, Peter Safran confirmed that the Clayface in the movie is the same one on “Creature Commandos.” This may seem odd since the two feel very different. Matt Hagen in the movie is ultimately a tragic figure. He’s an actor who had his greatest asset stripped away from him, and in an attempt to get his life back, took things too far and became a monster. On “Creature Commandos,” Clayface is vulgar, crass, and spends his free time playing Xbox. 

However, that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re not the same guy. Since we don’t know when “Clayface” takes place, there could easily be at least 10 years between these two iterations. In that time, maybe Matt Hagen has given up trying to be with Caitlyn and has resigned himself to a life of beer and video games. 

And remember what we said about Clayface possibly being more nanobot than man at this point? That could also be an underlying factor into why Clayface is so different in “Creature Commandos.” Matt’s entire identity could’ve been wiped away by this point, so the personality we see in “Clayface” is a moot point. 

Additionally, James Gunn and Peter Safran could easily decide later that these are two different Clayfaces. Or maybe we’ll never see Clayface again after this film and won’t have a reason to think about it again. Retcons are the name of the game when it comes to comic book adaptations. 

Where is Batman?

The DCU still needs its Batman. It was easy enough to overlook 2025’s “Superman,” but with “Clayface” set in Gotham, we’re really starting to wonder where the Caped Crusader is. We wouldn’t mind Robert Pattinson’s Batman being folded into the DCU, but the version of Gotham we see in “Clayface” looks decidedly different from what we get in “The Batman.” And since “The Batman” exists in a separate universe, chances are this was our first glimpse of the Gotham that’ll be explored further in the proposed “The Brave and the Bold” film that’ll cast another actor as the Dark Knight.

Depending on how far back “Clayface” is set, it’s possible Batman hasn’t been established yet. For all we know, Bruce Wayne is still just a kid while Matt Hagen is running amok. And the only villains we get are Markos and his gang. There doesn’t seem to be any other super-powered individuals in the city at this point, so Clayface may predate them. 

While “The Brave and the Bold” was announced a while ago, there hasn’t been much forward momentum as far as we’re aware. A new Batman hasn’t been cast, and it’s unclear when production will even begin. Logistically, it makes sense “Clayface” would contain zero Batman nods since that movie could still be a ways away. There are many things we’d love to see in “The Brave and the Bold,” and honestly, we’d love to see an even more formidable and disturbing Clayface return after stewing in those sewers for a while.