THE captain of the tragic Air India flight stayed calm as he deliberately cut off fuel to both engines seconds after takeoff, US officials have claimed.

Sumeet Sabharwal — the 56-year-old veteran at the controls of the ill-fated Boeing 787 Dreamliner — flipped the aircraft’s fuel control switches to “cut-off” just moments after liftoff from Ahmedabad in western India.

US officials reviewing the preliminary crash investigation told the Wall Street Journal a black box recording revealed a tense exchange in the cockpit.

First Officer Clive Kunder reportedly asked: “Why did you cut off?”

The captain then replied: “I didn’t.”

Sabharwal stayed eerily calm as the aircraft plunged.

The plane slammed into a hostel 30 seconds after takeoff killing 260 people including 52 Britons.

Only one person on board miraculously survived the crash on June 12.

The voice recorder captured the cockpit drama, but the actions that sealed the plane’s fate may have come down to a deliberate hand.

Now, new details from the US probe, launched because a Boeing was involved and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certified the plane, are zeroing in on Sabharwal.

Sources familiar with the American investigation said it was he who reached for the fuel control switches after the Dreamliner climbed off the runway.

The co-pilot, stunned, asked why, then panicked as Sabharwal stayed composed.

US officials familiar with the evidence told the WSJ the switches were moved to the “cut-off” position in quick succession – one second apart.

Ten seconds later, they were flipped back on but by then, both engines had already flamed out and crash was imminent.

A calm captain & panicked co-pilot

Kunder was flying the aircraft and his hands were on the controls.

Sabharwal, as the monitoring pilot, would likely have had his hands free.

That’s a key distinction, US pilots and safety experts say, and one that points toward who had the opportunity to touch the guarded fuel switches.

The preliminary report from India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) acknowledged the switches were flipped but didn’t say by whom — or whether it was deliberate.

But people familiar with the cockpit recordings and US officials’ review say the black box strongly suggests it was Sabharwal who moved them.

Ben Berman, a former senior official at the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), told the WSJ: “There was nothing to prompt the crew to perform emergency procedures, become stressed, or do anything except rotate the nose up and retract the landing gear, like they had done so many times before.”

‘Human hand’ behind the error

Captain Steve Scheibner, an aviation expert and seasoned pilot, believes the deadly Air India crash may have been the result of a human act inside the cockpit.

He suggested there was a “human hand” behind the tragedy of flight AI 171  – and insisted the aircraft itself was not to blame.

He told Piers Morgan Uncensored: “I really firmly believe that there had to be a human hand on both of those for them to go to cut off.”

The switches – guarded and located between the pilots – require deliberate action to move. Accidental flicking is virtually impossible.

Scheibner said the odds of a dual engine flameout on a Boeing 787 seconds after takeoff were “two and a half billion to one”.

“Everything just seems unbelievable,” he added.

“When you place both fuel cutoff switches to cut off, that will fuel-starve the engines and they’ll both flame out.

“There is no universe where there’s any procedure ever in the history of commercial flight where you place both fuel control switches to cut off, leave them there for 10 seconds, right after rotate.”

Former pilot Terry Tozer agrees, telling The Sun: “That implies that somebody did that as a conscious human action… They have a lock mechanism.

“I can’t see why any pilot would have their hands anywhere near the area where these switches are located.”

Who was Sumeet Sabharwal?

Captain Sumeet Sabharwal was no novice.

With over 15,000 flying hours — more than 8,000 on the Dreamliner — he had long been considered steady and reliable.

Friends described him as soft-spoken, precise, even minimalist.

“He was a very reserved guy right from the beginning,” said fellow pilot Kapil Kohal.

Known as “Sad Sack” in flight school for his solemn demeanor, Sabharwal lived simply.

Two shirts, two shoes, one bag.

“He was a middle-class boy looking at the sky and saying, ‘I want to be there,’” Kohal said.

But in recent years, Sabharwal had faced personal struggles.

He was reportedly just months from retirement, grieving his mother’s death and caring for his elderly father.

Some aviation sources told The Telegraph he had taken time off in past years for mental health issues.

Though he passed a Class I medical exam in September 2024, investigators are now combing through his records.

Investigation intensifies

US officials believe the crash may warrant a criminal investigation — something that would be automatic if the tragedy had happened on American soil.

In similar cases, the FBI would be brought in to assess whether a deliberate act had occurred.

Jennifer Homendy, NTSB chair, has been fully briefed on the cockpit recordings and flight data, and is pushing for clarity.

Her priority, she said, is “to quickly determine whether the crash presented any immediate safety concerns to the travelling public.”

So far, Boeing, GE Aerospace, and the FAA have issued no warnings or directives following the crash.

The aircraft’s systems were functioning normally. There were no bird strikes. No fuel contamination. No maintenance faults. No mechanical defects.

Air India’s CEO Campbell Wilson has urged staff not to jump to conclusions.

“The preliminary report identified no cause nor made any recommendations,” he said.

“It provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions.”

Indian authorities, meanwhile, have declined to comment on the American reports.

A Ministry of Civil Aviation press officer dismissed the Wall Street Journal’s reporting as “one-sided.”