Alex Jones asks Supreme Court to halt $1.4 billion defamation judgement 
Share and Follow


Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones urged the Supreme Court Thursday to immediately halt a $1.44 billion defamation judgment he owes for falsely claiming the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a hoax. 

Jones appealed the massive judgment to the high court last month, and the justices were already scheduled to review it at their closed-door conference Friday. 

Jones is now bringing an emergency appeal, which seeks to halt the judgment until the Supreme Court resolves the case. Jones warned that the shooting victims’ families are otherwise poised to take control of his InfoWars site and hand it over to The Onion, a satirical news site. 

“Without a stay now, when this case is reviewed and later reversed, InfoWars will have been acquired by its ideological nemesis and destroyed — which Jones believes is the Plaintiffs’ intention. Hence, Jones will clearly experience irreparable injury if a stay is not granted,” Jones’ lawyers wrote. 

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, an appointee of former President Obama, is assigned by default to handle emergency appeals arising from Connecticut. She could act on Jones’ request alone or refer it to the full court for a vote. 

The Hill has reached out to the families’ legal team for comment. 

A Connecticut jury in 2022 ordered Jones to pay the staggering sum for repeatedly claiming the massacre was a hoax, becoming one of the largest defamation judgments in U.S. history. 

Jones and his company filed for bankruptcy, and at one point, InfoWars was nearly turned over to The Onion in an auction until a judge rejected the sale.  

“It would have been as if the KKK levied on a judgment against the NAACP or a group of atheists took over a church or synagogue — ideologically polar opposites — and began to use the opposition entity for its own ideological purposes,” Jones’ lawyers described the proposal to the justices. 

Though Jones has expressed confidence that “all or substantially all” of the justices are inclined to rule in his favor, the court has yet to signal interest in the case.  They have not requested the families submit a response to the earlier petition.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Rising Dangers: Why the Surge in ICE Agents Could Lead to Increased Threats on the Streets

During a Tuesday segment on CNN’s “The Lead,” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey…

Senate Committees Advance Progress on CLARITY Act

In a significant legislative development for the future of digital assets in…

Eric Dier Hesitant to Exit Monaco Amid Premier League Interest; Manchester United Striker in Talks for Bradford Loan; Aston Villa Considering Departure of £21m Signing After Just One Year: Transfer Window Updates

The transfer window is now open, and fresh updates have emerged from…

Why Increasing Funding for a Runaway Agency Could Spell Disaster: What You Need to Know

During Tuesday’s episode of CNN’s “The Source,” Senator Tina Smith from Minnesota…

Historic Surge: U.S. Net Migration Reaches Highest Levels in Over Half a Century

During Joe Biden’s presidency, immigration policies perceived as lenient led to…

Mamdani Expresses Strong Opposition Following ICE Detainment of New York City Council Staffer

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) has voiced strong disapproval…

How Bari Weiss Sparked a Media Shift: CBS News Alters Coverage of Minneapolis ICE Event

One of the most frustrating tendencies of mainstream media is their…

Trump Sets March Deadline for the Departure of 2,500 Somalis

In a significant policy shift, President Donald Trump has directed thousands of…