Appeals court temporarily lifts judge’s block on Trump’s National Guard deployment 
Share and Follow


A federal appeals court panel late Thursday temporarily lifted a judge’s order ruling President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard illegal, enabling the troops to remain assisting with immigration raids in Los Angeles, for now. 

The ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals landed mere hours after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the president to return control of the troops to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) by Friday afternoon. 

The three-judge appeals panel is comprised of two Trump-nominated judges, Mark Bennett and Eric Miller, and Judge Jennifer Sung, an appointee of former President Biden. 

Their one-page order contained little explanation but suggests it is not a decision on the merits of the case in any way. 

Breyer, an appointee of former President Clinton who serves in San Francisco, said Trump failed to issue his order “through” Newsom as required by law and the situation on the ground didn’t present the prerequisites required for Trump to federalize the National Guard. 

“The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of ‘rebellion,’” Breyer wrote. 

His order was set to go into effect Friday afternoon. 

The Trump administration in urging the 9th Circuit to immediately intervene called the judge’s order “unprecedented” and an “extraordinary intrusion” into Trump’s authority. 

“That sort of second-guessing of the Commander in Chief’s military judgments is a gross violation of the separation of powers,” the Justice Department wrote in its motion. “Nearly 200 years ago, the Supreme Court made clear that these judgment calls are for the President to make—not a Governor, and certainly not a federal court.” 

The 9th Circuit issued its ruling before Newsom responded. His opposition was filed six minutes after the order. 

“An administrative stay is unnecessary and unwarranted in light of the district court’s extensive reasoning— in particular, its findings of irreparable harm to the State in the absence of injunctive relief. There are also serious questions regarding the appellate jurisdiction of this Court,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s (D) office wrote. 

Updated at 11:45 p.m. EDT.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Putin’s former classmate turned top judge Irina Podnosova dies at 71 in latest ‘mystery’ death of senior Russian figure

RUSSIA’S top judge and Putin’s former university pal has died today –…

Essex Chronicles: Reviving the Redskins Tradition – Celebrating Heritage Versus Modern Censorship

This is a story about John Two Guns White Calf, the last…

DOJ Dismissal Leads to Overturn of ATF’s Pistol Brace Regulation

The pistol brace rule instituted by the ATF was vacated on July…

Boy, 14, found frozen to death on volcano after posting haunting last video saying ‘I’m going to freeze my a** off’

A TEENAGE boy has frozen to death after he attempted to climb…

New Astronomer boss breaks silence after taking over from CEO Andy Byron who resigned in kiss cam ‘cheating scandal’

THE new boss of Astronomer, Pete Dejoy, has broken his silence after…

Acting ICE director fires back at Hunter Biden

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) acting director Todd Lyons on Wednesday slammed…

Live updates: Trump-Epstein saga enters third week; Hunter Biden forcefully defends his father

On the day that marks a year since former President Biden dropped…

Nayib Bukele and the White House Playfully Criticize Hunter Biden’s Comment on Invading El Salvador

As we reported earlier, Hunter Biden made some wild remarks about illegal…