Appeals court temporarily lifts judge’s block on Trump’s National Guard deployment 
Share and Follow


A federal appeals court panel late Thursday temporarily lifted a judge’s order ruling President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard illegal, enabling the troops to remain assisting with immigration raids in Los Angeles, for now. 

The ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals landed mere hours after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the president to return control of the troops to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) by Friday afternoon. 

The three-judge appeals panel is comprised of two Trump-nominated judges, Mark Bennett and Eric Miller, and Judge Jennifer Sung, an appointee of former President Biden. 

Their one-page order contained little explanation but suggests it is not a decision on the merits of the case in any way. 

Breyer, an appointee of former President Clinton who serves in San Francisco, said Trump failed to issue his order “through” Newsom as required by law and the situation on the ground didn’t present the prerequisites required for Trump to federalize the National Guard. 

“The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of ‘rebellion,’” Breyer wrote. 

His order was set to go into effect Friday afternoon. 

The Trump administration in urging the 9th Circuit to immediately intervene called the judge’s order “unprecedented” and an “extraordinary intrusion” into Trump’s authority. 

“That sort of second-guessing of the Commander in Chief’s military judgments is a gross violation of the separation of powers,” the Justice Department wrote in its motion. “Nearly 200 years ago, the Supreme Court made clear that these judgment calls are for the President to make—not a Governor, and certainly not a federal court.” 

The 9th Circuit issued its ruling before Newsom responded. His opposition was filed six minutes after the order. 

“An administrative stay is unnecessary and unwarranted in light of the district court’s extensive reasoning— in particular, its findings of irreparable harm to the State in the absence of injunctive relief. There are also serious questions regarding the appellate jurisdiction of this Court,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s (D) office wrote. 

Updated at 11:45 p.m. EDT.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

England vs Serbia – World Cup Qualifiers LIVE: Real-Time Score, Team Announcements, and Updates as Morgan Rogers Selected Over Jude Bellingham for Prestigious No. 10 Role

Another international break on the horizon? It seems like these breaks are…

Why Kris Jenner’s Birthday Posts No Longer Feature Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Photos

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were noticeably absent from Kim Kardashian’s Instagram…

Joe Rogan Shares Eerie Late-Night Experience with Mysterious Entities Following Tucker Carlson’s Controversial ‘Demonic Attack’ Claims

During a recent episode of his podcast, Joe Rogan shared an intriguing…

Ben Shapiro’s Surprising Stance: Firm Support for Tough January 6 Sentences Unveiled

Looking back to 2021, conservatives need to remember where Ben Shapiro stood…

Historic Government Shutdown Ends as House Approves Crucial Funding Bill

The federal government is set to resume operations on Thursday morning, concluding…

Woman Stabbed at Chicago Train Station Months Following Ukrainian Refugee’s Death

Chicago police are currently on the hunt for a man accused of…

Democrats Face Scrutiny Over Inaction on Epstein Files: Missed Opportunity or Strategic Move?

Republican Representative Tim Burchett from Tennessee’s 18th district recently challenged Democrats…

Nigeria’s Crackdown on Peaceful Protesters: A Call for Safety Met with Violence

Multiple Nigerian newspapers have reported a troubling incident that occurred on Wednesday,…