Conservative podcaster Benny Johnson is fully endorsing President Donald Trump’s dismissal of Jeffrey Epstein file scrutiny as a Democratic “hoax,” posting multiple X updates that echo Trump’s denials while ignoring calls for full disclosure.

Why it matters: Johnson’s vocal support underscores divisions within conservative circles over Epstein transparency, potentially influencing how Trump’s base views the issue amid bipartisan demands for full file releases.

Driving the news: Johnson shared a flurry of posts supporting Trump’s claims, including a disputed Wall Street Journal letter and Trump’s orders to unseal grand jury testimony, framing them as proof the issue is overblown.

• He shared Trump’s post questioning why Democrats didn’t use Epstein “files” during their control, labeling it “NOTHING!!!”
• Johnson highlighted House Speaker Mike Johnson’s conversation with Trump, where Trump called the WSJ letter “patently absurd.”
• He touted his earlier predictions of more disclosures, crediting pushback from figures like Charlie Kirk.

Catch up quick: Trump has labeled Epstein file demands a “Jeffrey Epstein Hoax” orchestrated by Democrats, following Attorney General Pam Bondi’s decision against further releases. This comes after initial DOJ promises for transparency, with Trump now ordering unsealing of grand jury testimony.

The intrigue: Johnson’s posts frame recent developments—like Trump’s order to unseal testimony—as vindication for early skeptics, while dismissing critics as falling for misinformation.

Between the lines: By amplifying Trump’s hoax claims, Johnson appears to shield the president from scrutiny, even as congressional leaders from both parties press for complete evidence to ensure no coverups persist.

What they’re saying:

• “This aged like a fine wine… Who’s laughing now?” Benny Johnson said on X, celebrating perceived progress on Epstein disclosures.

The bottom line: While Johnson rallies Trump’s base with hoax rhetoric, the Epstein saga demands genuine transparency to address legitimate concerns, not deflection that risks eroding public trust further.