California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
Share and Follow


The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) plan to redistrict California’s congressional map.

“Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,” reads a brief order posted to the docket. 

Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters’ approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. 

The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election.

Republicans’ legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. 

Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting plans.

Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state’s high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the effort.

The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers’ attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats’ strategy would be “comically absurd.” 

In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is “not the end of this fight.”

“This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats’ plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,” the statement reads.

“We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,” it continued.

Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Shapiro Claims Kamala Harris’ Team Questioned His Allegiance to Israel

In a recent revelation, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, has made…

Unpacking Jerome Powell’s Dilemma: Greenland, Tariffs, and Economic Turbulence

When Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appears on a Sunday talk show,…

Senator Tillis Embarks on Dynamic Final Year with Bold Initiatives

Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina has never hesitated to express his…

Netflix Adapts: New Strategy Ensures Movie Plots Are Repeatedly Explained for Phone-Scrolling Viewers

Actor Matt Damon recently shared some intriguing insights about how Netflix influences…

Trump Evades Questions on Potential Military Action for Greenland Acquisition

During an interview with NBC News on Monday, President Trump refrained from…

Morning Brief: Protesters’ Actions Under Scrutiny in Ongoing Narrative

Monday, January 19, 2026 Good morning, and welcome to RedState’s “Morning…

Calls for Australian Tennis Icon Wally Masur’s Dismissal Following Controversial Comment on Novak Djokovic

Enraged tennis enthusiasts are demanding the removal of a renowned tennis commentator…

Trump Attends College Football Playoff Final with Ivanka and Kai, Greeted Enthusiastically by Miami Fans

Donald Trump received a warm reception from the Miami crowd as he…