Boasberg Admits He Doesn't 'Have the Power' to Stop Trump Deportation Flights in Huge Friday Night Ruling
Share and Follow


Just when I think the federal judiciary can’t possibly make a further mockery of itself, it manages to do just that. Don’t get me wrong — there are still plenty of solid jurists out there, and we’ve seen some favorable (and proper) rulings in the multitude of cases involving the Trump administration. I expect to see more. I also don’t expect the administration to win every case/issue. I’m not naive, and they’re not perfect. 

That said, a federal district court judge in Massachusetts on Wednesday really outdid himself with a pair of rulings issued in one of the many ongoing immigration/removal-related cases. Not only did he find that the Trump administration had violated his previously entered preliminary injunction, but the remedy he ordered for that was beyond ridiculous. 

To set the stage, I’ll refer back to Ward Clark’s reporting on the issue from Wednesday morning:

To begin at the beginning: On Tuesday, a federal district judge, Brian E. Murphy, ordered the Department of Homeland Security to maintain custody of any illegal aliens being deported to a third-party nation — that is, a nation that is neither the United States nor the home country of the persons in question. Of particular note were eight illegal aliens from Vietnam, Mexico, Cuba, Myanmar, and other places. All have been convicted of serious crimes and were to be deported to detention in South Sudan. Deportation flights for these illegals have, for the moment, halted.

Note that the eight men who are the specific subjects named here are not just illegal aliens. They have committed heinous crimes, far beyond just the fact of their illegal entry. These monsters have preyed on American citizens, and the Trump administration is correct to seek their removal, but in several of these cases, the criminals’ home nation won’t accept their return. South Sudan, granted, is an eyebrow-raising choice of destinations, but as of this writing, it’s unclear if that was the final destination for these criminals.

So, to be clear, these were individuals convicted of vicious crimes who were already subject to removal. The only hang-up was that their own native countries didn’t want them back. (Imagine that.) 


Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Tragic Twist: Latest Update on Young Shark Attack Survivor Nico Antic

The tragic news has emerged that 12-year-old Nico Antic, who was the…

DHS Responds: Army Veteran’s Rights Intact After Assault Incident in Minneapolis ICE Operation

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has responded to accusations from…

Syria Calls on EU to Repatriate Citizens Amid Rising ISIS Prison Break Concerns

A senior official from al-Aqtan prison in Raqqa, Syria, issued an urgent…

HHS Prohibits Use of Fetal Tissue in Federally Funded Research Programs

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced a…

Fox News Host Jesse Watters Faces Backlash After Controversial Claim Regarding U.S. Ownership of the Moon

Fox News anchor Jesse Watters stirred controversy among viewers by asserting that…

Arizona AG Mayes Raises Controversy with Comments on Citizens Defending Against Masked ICE Agents

In Minnesota, the persistent unrest continues as demonstrators relentlessly target ICE…

TikTok Secures U.S. Operations Amid Renewed Democratic Calls for Investigation

For years, TikTok, the social media giant, has been at the…

Andy Burnham’s Bold Return: Potential Labour Civil War Looms as Starmer Weighs Response

Andy Burnham has revealed his intention to run for a seat in…