Boasberg Admits He Doesn't 'Have the Power' to Stop Trump Deportation Flights in Huge Friday Night Ruling
Share and Follow


Just when I think the federal judiciary can’t possibly make a further mockery of itself, it manages to do just that. Don’t get me wrong — there are still plenty of solid jurists out there, and we’ve seen some favorable (and proper) rulings in the multitude of cases involving the Trump administration. I expect to see more. I also don’t expect the administration to win every case/issue. I’m not naive, and they’re not perfect. 

That said, a federal district court judge in Massachusetts on Wednesday really outdid himself with a pair of rulings issued in one of the many ongoing immigration/removal-related cases. Not only did he find that the Trump administration had violated his previously entered preliminary injunction, but the remedy he ordered for that was beyond ridiculous. 

To set the stage, I’ll refer back to Ward Clark’s reporting on the issue from Wednesday morning:

To begin at the beginning: On Tuesday, a federal district judge, Brian E. Murphy, ordered the Department of Homeland Security to maintain custody of any illegal aliens being deported to a third-party nation — that is, a nation that is neither the United States nor the home country of the persons in question. Of particular note were eight illegal aliens from Vietnam, Mexico, Cuba, Myanmar, and other places. All have been convicted of serious crimes and were to be deported to detention in South Sudan. Deportation flights for these illegals have, for the moment, halted.

Note that the eight men who are the specific subjects named here are not just illegal aliens. They have committed heinous crimes, far beyond just the fact of their illegal entry. These monsters have preyed on American citizens, and the Trump administration is correct to seek their removal, but in several of these cases, the criminals’ home nation won’t accept their return. South Sudan, granted, is an eyebrow-raising choice of destinations, but as of this writing, it’s unclear if that was the final destination for these criminals.

So, to be clear, these were individuals convicted of vicious crimes who were already subject to removal. The only hang-up was that their own native countries didn’t want them back. (Imagine that.) 


Share and Follow
You May Also Like

Scandal Behind Bars: Prison Officer’s Multiple Affairs with Inmates Sparks Investigation

Isabelle Dale had a distinct preference when it came to her romantic…

Woman Stabbed at Chicago Train Station Months Following Ukrainian Refugee’s Death

Chicago police are currently on the hunt for a man accused of…

Breaking: Trump Approves Short-Term Funding Bill, Concluding Government Shutdown

On Wednesday evening, President Trump approved a revised continuing resolution, a…

Nigeria’s Crackdown on Peaceful Protesters: A Call for Safety Met with Violence

Multiple Nigerian newspapers have reported a troubling incident that occurred on Wednesday,…

Trump Delivers on Pledge to Compensate Workers Affected by Schumer Shutdown

President Donald Trump has fulfilled his promise to reward federal employees…

High-Profile Resignations Shake Ukrainian Government Amid Corruption Revelations

Ukraine’s justice and energy ministers stepped down on Wednesday amid a swiftly…

Veteran Fox News Anchor Announces Hiatus Citing Health Concerns

A seasoned Fox News presenter has announced a temporary hiatus from her…

Democrats Face Scrutiny Over Inaction on Epstein Files: Missed Opportunity or Strategic Move?

Republican Representative Tim Burchett from Tennessee’s 18th district recently challenged Democrats…